A comparison of normobaric and hypobaric hypoxia effects on cerebrovascular response pre and post maximal exercise

A lack of consensus remains on whether normobaric hypoxia (NH) and hypobaric hypoxia (HH) may differentially impact physiological factors affecting cerebrovascular regulation, particularly with an additional strenuous exercise component. We sought to compare the acute effects of NH and HH on global cerebral blood flow (gCBF) at an altitude corresponding to 4000 m. In this randomised, single-blind crossover study, eight lowlanders (3 females) completed three identical trials inside a hypobaric chamber: the first in normobaric normoxia, for familiarisation, followed in random order by one in NH and one in HH. In each trial, gCBF was measured at two time points via duplex ultrasound, first after 25 min of rest, and second, directly after a graded exercise test (GXT) to volitional exhaustion. Cardiorespiratory responses and cerebral oxygenation ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi> <mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi> <mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>${\mathrm{r}}{S_{{\mathrm{c}}{{\mathrm{O}}_{\mathrm{2}}}}}$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> ) were assessed during all gCBF measurements. At rest, gCBF was higher in HH than in NH (944 ± 230 vs. 883 ± 226 mL min<sup>-1</sup>; P = 0.027, respectively), whereas <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi> <mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi> <mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>${\mathrm{r}}{S_{{\mathrm{c}}{{\mathrm{O}}_{\mathrm{2}}}}}$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> remained unchanged. Cardiorespiratory parameters did not differ, except for a reduction in the ratio of dead space to tidal volume in HH compared to NH (P = 0.028). Post-GXT, no differential response between the two hypoxic conditions was found. In comparison to NH, at rest gCBF is increased in HH for a given partial pressure of inspired oxygen, a response that is subsequently abolished post maximal cycling exercise. Although subtle, this response indicates that cerebrovascular regulation is affected differently in NH and HH, despite negligible changes in ventilation, and thus, alternative explanations are explored for future investigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Experimental Physiology
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1113/ep093088
Primary Topic
High Altitude and Hypoxia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparison of normobaric and hypobaric hypoxia effects on cerebrovascular response pre and post maximal exercise

Giacomo Strapazzon, Rachel Turner, Hannes Gatterer, Giovanni Vinetti
Experimental Physiology
High Altitude and Hypoxia
article

A comparison of normobaric and hypobaric hypoxia effects on cerebrovascular response pre and post maximal exercise

Giacomo Strapazzon, Rachel Turner, Hannes Gatterer, Giovanni Vinetti
article en

Abstract

A lack of consensus remains on whether normobaric hypoxia (NH) and hypobaric hypoxia (HH) may differentially impact physiological factors affecting cerebrovascular regulation, particularly with an additional strenuous exercise component. We sought to compare the acute effects of NH and HH on global cerebral blood flow (gCBF) at an altitude corresponding to 4000 m. In this randomised, single-blind crossover study, eight lowlanders (3 females) completed three identical trials inside a hypobaric chamber: the first in normobaric normoxia, for familiarisation, followed in random order by one in NH and one in HH. In each trial, gCBF was measured at two time points via duplex ultrasound, first after 25 min of rest, and second, directly after a graded exercise test (GXT) to volitional exhaustion. Cardiorespiratory responses and cerebral oxygenation ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi> <mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi> <mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>${\mathrm{r}}{S_{{\mathrm{c}}{{\mathrm{O}}_{\mathrm{2}}}}}$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> ) were assessed during all gCBF measurements. At rest, gCBF was higher in HH than in NH (944 ± 230 vs. 883 ± 226 mL min<sup>-1</sup>; P = 0.027, respectively), whereas <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi> <mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi> <mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>${\mathrm{r}}{S_{{\mathrm{c}}{{\mathrm{O}}_{\mathrm{2}}}}}$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> remained unchanged. Cardiorespiratory parameters did not differ, except for a reduction in the ratio of dead space to tidal volume in HH compared to NH (P = 0.028). Post-GXT, no differential response between the two hypoxic conditions was found. In comparison to NH, at rest gCBF is increased in HH for a given partial pressure of inspired oxygen, a response that is subsequently abolished post maximal cycling exercise. Although subtle, this response indicates that cerebrovascular regulation is affected differently in NH and HH, despite negligible changes in ventilation, and thus, alternative explanations are explored for future investigation.

Experimental Physiology
Eurac Research (IT), University of Padua (IT), Universität Innsbruck (AT), Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
High Altitude and Hypoxia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.