Randomized variants of tasks in mathematics computer-aided assessment—a theoretical model and empirical validation

Abstract Online self-assessments, a specific type of e-assessment, are gaining increased importance as they can facilitate the transition from school to higher education. However, many aspects of online self-assessments and e-assessments are currently under-researched. This also applies to automated randomization, i.e., the automated creation of task variants of equivalent difficulty, which is crucial to realize the full potential of e-assessments, for example, by helping to avoid plagiarism in summative assessments or by enabling students to answer different variants of a task in formative assessments. In particular, a systematic analysis of aspects of mathematical tasks that can be varied, from a content-general perspective, and of how the variation of these aspects relates to task difficulty is still missing. The present paper addresses this gap by proposing a cross-content model for the difficulty of variants of mathematical tasks. The model includes two key elements of mathematical tasks: the solution path and the calculation effort, which are relevant to task difficulty across various mathematical content areas. Both can be used to generate informed predictions about differences in expected task difficulty. This paper provides details on the proposed model, along with empirical evidence from a study involving 105 mathematics freshmen, to support the model and its validity. In this study, we systematically created task variants and used generalized linear mixed-effects models to examine the impact of variations in the solution path and calculation effort on the solution rates of these task variants. Our findings substantiate our hypotheses on how solution path and calculation effort can be used to influence task difficulty. We discuss implications for future research as well as practical implications of how the proposed model may serve as a useful tool for addressing task variants in general and automated, randomized task variants in e-assessments in particular.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Teaching Mathematics and its Applications An International Journal of the IMA
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hraf019
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Randomized variants of tasks in mathematics computer-aided assessment—a theoretical model and empirical validation

Daniel Sommerhoff, Irene Neumann, Carl Wolfert
Teaching Mathematics and its Applications An International Journal of the IMA
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

Randomized variants of tasks in mathematics computer-aided assessment—a theoretical model and empirical validation

Daniel Sommerhoff, Irene Neumann, Carl Wolfert
article en

Abstract

Abstract Online self-assessments, a specific type of e-assessment, are gaining increased importance as they can facilitate the transition from school to higher education. However, many aspects of online self-assessments and e-assessments are currently under-researched. This also applies to automated randomization, i.e., the automated creation of task variants of equivalent difficulty, which is crucial to realize the full potential of e-assessments, for example, by helping to avoid plagiarism in summative assessments or by enabling students to answer different variants of a task in formative assessments. In particular, a systematic analysis of aspects of mathematical tasks that can be varied, from a content-general perspective, and of how the variation of these aspects relates to task difficulty is still missing. The present paper addresses this gap by proposing a cross-content model for the difficulty of variants of mathematical tasks. The model includes two key elements of mathematical tasks: the solution path and the calculation effort, which are relevant to task difficulty across various mathematical content areas. Both can be used to generate informed predictions about differences in expected task difficulty. This paper provides details on the proposed model, along with empirical evidence from a study involving 105 mathematics freshmen, to support the model and its validity. In this study, we systematically created task variants and used generalized linear mixed-effects models to examine the impact of variations in the solution path and calculation effort on the solution rates of these task variants. Our findings substantiate our hypotheses on how solution path and calculation effort can be used to influence task difficulty. We discuss implications for future research as well as practical implications of how the proposed model may serve as a useful tool for addressing task variants in general and automated, randomized task variants in e-assessments in particular.

Teaching Mathematics and its Applications An International Journal of the IMA
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE), Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.