Genetic study of the Shuangwang gold deposit in the Western Qinling, China: Constraints from monazite dating, S isotope, and Ca isotope compositions

• The U-Pb dating of monazite constrains the age of gold mineralization in Shuangwang gold deposit to 221.9 Ma ∼ 214.4 Ma, which is comparable to the timeframe of magmatic activity in the region. • Source of ore material and ore fluid is proposed based on the in-situ sulfur isotope composition of pyrite and calcium isotope of carbonates The West Qinling region hosts a wide variety of gold deposits in China. The genesis of the Shuangwang gold deposit in the Fengxian–Taibai area has long been debated, with multiple interpretations proposed in previous studies. The primary points under debate are the uncertainty in the metallogenic age of the deposit and the ambiguity in the sources of the ore-forming materials. The deposit primarily consists of breccia-type ores, in which the breccia clasts are primarily composed of Devonian albite, while the cement consists mainly of hydrothermal ankerite, calcite, pyrite, and quartz, with hydrothermal monazite developed within. This study investigates the mineralization age of the Shuangwang gold deposit through U–Pb dating of monazite within the cement of the breccia-type ores. Additionally, the S isotopes of pyrite from the main mineralization stages were analyzed using LA–MC–ICP–MS, and Ca isotopes of the cement were determined to constrain the sources of ore-forming materials and fluids. Monazite U–Pb ages of 221.9 ± 1.3 Ma, 216.9 ± 3.3 Ma, and 214.4 ± 2.0 Ma were obtained, corresponding to the mineralization period of nearby magmatic–hydrothermal deposits and aligning with regional Triassic magmatic activity. Four textural types of pyrite were identified microscopically. The in-situ S isotope compositions of euhedral, vein-type, massive, and allotriomorphic pyrites ranged from 11.30‰ to 12.73‰ (average 11.94‰), 5.982‰ to 12.76‰ (average 9.202‰), 7.625‰ to 11.17‰ (average 9.306‰), and 6.988‰ to 12.28‰ (average 10.00‰), respectively. The Ca isotope values of ankerite and calcite ranged from 0.23‰ to 0.29‰ and from 0.22‰ to 0.38‰, respectively. Based on isotopic evidence and dating reuslt, this study proposes that mineralization at Shuangwang is closely related to regional magmatic activity. The ore-forming fluids exhibits characteristics of water–rock interaction between the surrounding Devonian Xinghongpu Formation and the magmatic hydrothermal fluid, during which magmatic hydrothermal fluids leached wallrocks and mobilized ore-forming components that ultimately participated in gold mineralization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ore Geology Reviews
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2026.107143
Primary Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genetic study of the Shuangwang gold deposit in the Western Qinling, China: Constraints from monazite dating, S isotope, and Ca isotope compositions

Liu Shanbao, Chen Binghan, Cheng Jianjun, Fan Jianfu
Ore Geology Reviews
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
article

Genetic study of the Shuangwang gold deposit in the Western Qinling, China: Constraints from monazite dating, S isotope, and Ca isotope compositions

Liu Shanbao, Chen Binghan, Cheng Jianjun, Fan Jianfu
article en

Abstract

• The U-Pb dating of monazite constrains the age of gold mineralization in Shuangwang gold deposit to 221.9 Ma ∼ 214.4 Ma, which is comparable to the timeframe of magmatic activity in the region. • Source of ore material and ore fluid is proposed based on the in-situ sulfur isotope composition of pyrite and calcium isotope of carbonates The West Qinling region hosts a wide variety of gold deposits in China. The genesis of the Shuangwang gold deposit in the Fengxian–Taibai area has long been debated, with multiple interpretations proposed in previous studies. The primary points under debate are the uncertainty in the metallogenic age of the deposit and the ambiguity in the sources of the ore-forming materials. The deposit primarily consists of breccia-type ores, in which the breccia clasts are primarily composed of Devonian albite, while the cement consists mainly of hydrothermal ankerite, calcite, pyrite, and quartz, with hydrothermal monazite developed within. This study investigates the mineralization age of the Shuangwang gold deposit through U–Pb dating of monazite within the cement of the breccia-type ores. Additionally, the S isotopes of pyrite from the main mineralization stages were analyzed using LA–MC–ICP–MS, and Ca isotopes of the cement were determined to constrain the sources of ore-forming materials and fluids. Monazite U–Pb ages of 221.9 ± 1.3 Ma, 216.9 ± 3.3 Ma, and 214.4 ± 2.0 Ma were obtained, corresponding to the mineralization period of nearby magmatic–hydrothermal deposits and aligning with regional Triassic magmatic activity. Four textural types of pyrite were identified microscopically. The in-situ S isotope compositions of euhedral, vein-type, massive, and allotriomorphic pyrites ranged from 11.30‰ to 12.73‰ (average 11.94‰), 5.982‰ to 12.76‰ (average 9.202‰), 7.625‰ to 11.17‰ (average 9.306‰), and 6.988‰ to 12.28‰ (average 10.00‰), respectively. The Ca isotope values of ankerite and calcite ranged from 0.23‰ to 0.29‰ and from 0.22‰ to 0.38‰, respectively. Based on isotopic evidence and dating reuslt, this study proposes that mineralization at Shuangwang is closely related to regional magmatic activity. The ore-forming fluids exhibits characteristics of water–rock interaction between the surrounding Devonian Xinghongpu Formation and the magmatic hydrothermal fluid, during which magmatic hydrothermal fluids leached wallrocks and mobilized ore-forming components that ultimately participated in gold mineralization.

Ore Geology ReviewsVol. 190
Beijing Institute of Geology for Mineral Resources (CN), Wuxi Taiji industry (China) (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.