Abstract TP219: Positive Predicative Value of a Screening Tool in the Detection of Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke

Introduction: Randomized controlled trials have shown that endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) improves functional outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke secondary to a large vessel occlusion (LVO). The odds of a favorable clinical outcome with EVT are increased when onset to puncture times are reduced. Although the BEFAST screen, which is commonly used in most emergency rooms to detect stroke, is a sensitive tool, it does not differentiate between stroke subtypes. A targeted LVO screening tool that is fast, easy to use, and reliable can help detect LVO sooner, hastening delivery of emergency treatment to improve the odds of a favorable functional outcome. Objective: This project seeks to determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of a criteria-based early LVO screening tool for the detection of large vessel occlusion. Methods: One hundred and four patients across two hospitals with a positive BEFAST stroke assessment were evaluated with the “Early LVO Screen” from February 2024 to July 2025. Three criteria were included in the screening tool: gaze deviation, aphasia, and NIHSS ≥ 10. A positive screen indicated the patient had one or more of these criteria on initial clinical presentation. Patient positive screens were then compared with findings on standard vascular imaging. Results: A positive screen was noted in 104 patients. Forty-six of the 104 patients were found to have confirmed LVO on imaging, indicating a 44% overall PPV of the screen. Aphasia and NIHSS score ≥10 were the most common criteria detected in 67% of screened patients and together had a 66% PPV for detecting LVO. Gaze deviation was seen in 52% of patients and had a 61% PPV for detecting LVO. When gaze was combined with NIHSS > 10, the PPV for detecting LVO was 67%. When all three criteria were present, the PPV for identifying patients with LVO was 73%. Conclusion: The “Early LVO screen”, especially when all three criteria are present, is a quick and reliable screening tool that has a high PPV for detecting LVO prior to confirmation with vessel imaging. Having only three criteria to assess makes this an easy-to-use tool that can be utilized by neurology and non-neurology providers alike, with applications spanning pre-hospital and emergency room settings. By identifying patients with LVO sooner, this tool may be useful in decreasing time to neuroendovascular team notification and mobilization, in turn, hastening the delivery of life saving treatment to acute stroke patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stroke
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/str.57.suppl_1.tp219
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract TP219: Positive Predicative Value of a Screening Tool in the Detection of Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke

James Chrystal, Linda Sugrue, Sarah Schulok, Denise Daly
Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

Abstract TP219: Positive Predicative Value of a Screening Tool in the Detection of Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke

James Chrystal, Linda Sugrue, Sarah Schulok, Denise Daly
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Randomized controlled trials have shown that endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) improves functional outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke secondary to a large vessel occlusion (LVO). The odds of a favorable clinical outcome with EVT are increased when onset to puncture times are reduced. Although the BEFAST screen, which is commonly used in most emergency rooms to detect stroke, is a sensitive tool, it does not differentiate between stroke subtypes. A targeted LVO screening tool that is fast, easy to use, and reliable can help detect LVO sooner, hastening delivery of emergency treatment to improve the odds of a favorable functional outcome. Objective: This project seeks to determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of a criteria-based early LVO screening tool for the detection of large vessel occlusion. Methods: One hundred and four patients across two hospitals with a positive BEFAST stroke assessment were evaluated with the “Early LVO Screen” from February 2024 to July 2025. Three criteria were included in the screening tool: gaze deviation, aphasia, and NIHSS ≥ 10. A positive screen indicated the patient had one or more of these criteria on initial clinical presentation. Patient positive screens were then compared with findings on standard vascular imaging. Results: A positive screen was noted in 104 patients. Forty-six of the 104 patients were found to have confirmed LVO on imaging, indicating a 44% overall PPV of the screen. Aphasia and NIHSS score ≥10 were the most common criteria detected in 67% of screened patients and together had a 66% PPV for detecting LVO. Gaze deviation was seen in 52% of patients and had a 61% PPV for detecting LVO. When gaze was combined with NIHSS > 10, the PPV for detecting LVO was 67%. When all three criteria were present, the PPV for identifying patients with LVO was 73%. Conclusion: The “Early LVO screen”, especially when all three criteria are present, is a quick and reliable screening tool that has a high PPV for detecting LVO prior to confirmation with vessel imaging. Having only three criteria to assess makes this an easy-to-use tool that can be utilized by neurology and non-neurology providers alike, with applications spanning pre-hospital and emergency room settings. By identifying patients with LVO sooner, this tool may be useful in decreasing time to neuroendovascular team notification and mobilization, in turn, hastening the delivery of life saving treatment to acute stroke patients.

StrokeVol. 57(Suppl_1)
Phelps Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.