High-precision tracking of human foragers reveals adaptive social information use in the wild
Foraging complexity and competitive social challenges are considered key drivers of human cognition. Yet, the decision-making mechanisms that underlie social foraging in the real world remain unknown. Integrating high-precision Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking and video footage from large-scale foraging competitions with cognitive-computational modeling and agent-based simulations, we show how foragers integrate personal, social, and ecological information to guide spatial search and patch-leaving decisions. We show how the social context emerges as a key driver of foraging dynamics. Foragers adaptively rely on social information to locate resources when unsuccessful and extend giving-up times in the presence of others, which results in increased area-restricted search at high social densities. These findings demonstrate the importance of sociality for human foraging decisions and provide a template for harnessing high-resolution tracking data to study real-world cognition.
Authors
- Marwa M. Kavelaars (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7631-9999)
- Dominik Deffner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1649-3861)
- Christopher T. Monk (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1647-4740)
- Petri T. Niemelä (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7518-4057)
- Alexander Schakowski
- Ralf H. J. M. Kurvers (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3460-0392)
- Raine Kortet
- Maria Pykälä
Institutions
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
- University of Eastern Finland (FI)
- GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (DE)
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
- Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (DE)
- Max Planck Institute for Human Development (DE)
- University of Lausanne (CH)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Science
- Published
- 2026-01-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ady1055
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Diffusion and Search Dynamics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 44.47