Abstract DP299: Oral antithrombotic therapy for patients with stroke and active cancer: A secondary analysis of BAT 2 study

Introduction: Patients with ischemic stroke (IS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) who also have cancer are at risks for ischemic and bleeding events, and mortality. The optimal oral antithrombotic therapy for secondary stroke prevention in patients with cancer remains unclear. This study aimed to reveal the differences in recurrent IS, major bleeding (MB), and all-cause mortality in patients with IS/TIA who had with cancer. Methods: In this investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter, observational study, patients with cerebrovascular or cardiovascular diseases, who were taking oral antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant agents, were enrolled from October 2016 to April 2019. For this secondary analysis, we collected data on patients with IS/TIA receiving oral antithrombotic therapy for secondary stroke prevention. Patients with uncured cancer was defined as active cancer (AC) and others as non-cancer groups. Results: Of the 4,727 patients (median age: 72 [IQR: 65–79] years; 1,561 [33.0%] women) with IS/TIA, 91 (1.9%) had AC. Of all patients, 3,354 were treated with antiplatelet agent [65, 1.9% with cancer], 1,134 patients to anticoagulant agent [17, 1.5%], and 239 patients to combination therapy [9, 3.8%]. The 1-year rates of recurrent IS (3.4% vs. 2.5%, HR 1.20, 95%CI 0.45-3.24) and MB (0% vs. 1.1%, HR 1.32, 95%CI 0.33-5.39) were not significantly different between AC and non-cancer groups. However, the 1-year mortality rate was significantly higher in the AC than non-cancer group (7.7% vs. 2.1%, HR 5.61, 95%CI 3.41-9.24). In the AC group (median age: 78 [IQR: 70–83] years; 26 [28.6%] women; 65 patients to antiplatelet; 17 anticoagulant; 9 combination], the 1-year rates of recurrent IS (3.2%, 5.9%, 0%), MB (3.2%, 5.9%, 0%) and mortality (4.6%, 17.6%, 11.1%) were not significantly different between antiplatelet, anticoagulant, and combination therapy, respectively. The multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that female (aHR 0.13, 95%CI 0.02-0.76), dyslipidemia (aHR 0.19, 95%CI 0.04-0.83), CRP (aHR 1.45, 95%CI 1.16-1.80) and D-dimer (aHR 1.17, 95%CI 1.05-1.31) were independent predictor of mortality. Conclusion: Patients with IS/TIA and AC had a higher risk of mortality than those without cancer. The type of oral antithrombotic agent was not associated with recurrent IS, MB or mortality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stroke
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/str.57.suppl_1.dp299
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract DP299: Oral antithrombotic therapy for patients with stroke and active cancer: A secondary analysis of BAT 2 study

Kaori Miwa, Akira Tsujino, Sohei YOSHIMURA, Masatoshi Koga et al.
Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

Abstract DP299: Oral antithrombotic therapy for patients with stroke and active cancer: A secondary analysis of BAT 2 study

Kaori Miwa, Akira Tsujino, Sohei YOSHIMURA, Masatoshi Koga, Kanta Tanaka, Yasuhiro Ito, Kazunori Toyoda, Yusuke Yakushiji, Teruyuki Hirano, Shigeru Fujimoto, Yasuhiro Hasegawa, Honda Yuko, Hiroyuki Kawano
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with ischemic stroke (IS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) who also have cancer are at risks for ischemic and bleeding events, and mortality. The optimal oral antithrombotic therapy for secondary stroke prevention in patients with cancer remains unclear. This study aimed to reveal the differences in recurrent IS, major bleeding (MB), and all-cause mortality in patients with IS/TIA who had with cancer. Methods: In this investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter, observational study, patients with cerebrovascular or cardiovascular diseases, who were taking oral antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant agents, were enrolled from October 2016 to April 2019. For this secondary analysis, we collected data on patients with IS/TIA receiving oral antithrombotic therapy for secondary stroke prevention. Patients with uncured cancer was defined as active cancer (AC) and others as non-cancer groups. Results: Of the 4,727 patients (median age: 72 [IQR: 65–79] years; 1,561 [33.0%] women) with IS/TIA, 91 (1.9%) had AC. Of all patients, 3,354 were treated with antiplatelet agent [65, 1.9% with cancer], 1,134 patients to anticoagulant agent [17, 1.5%], and 239 patients to combination therapy [9, 3.8%]. The 1-year rates of recurrent IS (3.4% vs. 2.5%, HR 1.20, 95%CI 0.45-3.24) and MB (0% vs. 1.1%, HR 1.32, 95%CI 0.33-5.39) were not significantly different between AC and non-cancer groups. However, the 1-year mortality rate was significantly higher in the AC than non-cancer group (7.7% vs. 2.1%, HR 5.61, 95%CI 3.41-9.24). In the AC group (median age: 78 [IQR: 70–83] years; 26 [28.6%] women; 65 patients to antiplatelet; 17 anticoagulant; 9 combination], the 1-year rates of recurrent IS (3.2%, 5.9%, 0%), MB (3.2%, 5.9%, 0%) and mortality (4.6%, 17.6%, 11.1%) were not significantly different between antiplatelet, anticoagulant, and combination therapy, respectively. The multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that female (aHR 0.13, 95%CI 0.02-0.76), dyslipidemia (aHR 0.19, 95%CI 0.04-0.83), CRP (aHR 1.45, 95%CI 1.16-1.80) and D-dimer (aHR 1.17, 95%CI 1.05-1.31) were independent predictor of mortality. Conclusion: Patients with IS/TIA and AC had a higher risk of mortality than those without cancer. The type of oral antithrombotic agent was not associated with recurrent IS, MB or mortality.

StrokeVol. 57(Suppl_1)
Kansai Medical University (JP), Jichi Medical University (JP), St. Marianna University School of Medicine (JP), Kawasaki Medical School (JP), Kyorin University (JP), Toyota Memorial Hospital (JP), National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center (JP), Nagasaki University Hospital (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.