Presidential Messages on Legislation and the Congressional Targets of Lobbying

ABSTRACT Despite strong reasons to expect presidents' announced stances on legislation to influence how organized interests lobby Congress, this effect remains underexplored. I advance a theory that Statements of Administration Policy (SAPs), sent by presidents to Congress to convey their positions on legislation, may also send signals to interest groups about when to lobby Congress and which legislators to lobby. To test it, I analyze panel data combining SAPs issued by Clinton to Biden, records of lobbying contact extracted from reports filed under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), and committee and floor agendas in Congress. Analysis of both committee and legislator data shows that SAPs strongly predict whom lobbyists choose to target, and more so than congressional agendas alone can explain. Furthermore, SAPs predict more advocacy specifically by elite lobbying firms. These findings suggest that presidential position‐taking may elicit responses not only from Congress but also from organized interests and draw battle lines for both institutional and outside actors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Presidential Studies Quarterly
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/psq.70030
Primary Topic
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Presidential Messages on Legislation and the Congressional Targets of Lobbying

Huchen Liu
Presidential Studies Quarterly
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
article

Presidential Messages on Legislation and the Congressional Targets of Lobbying

Huchen Liu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Despite strong reasons to expect presidents' announced stances on legislation to influence how organized interests lobby Congress, this effect remains underexplored. I advance a theory that Statements of Administration Policy (SAPs), sent by presidents to Congress to convey their positions on legislation, may also send signals to interest groups about when to lobby Congress and which legislators to lobby. To test it, I analyze panel data combining SAPs issued by Clinton to Biden, records of lobbying contact extracted from reports filed under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), and committee and floor agendas in Congress. Analysis of both committee and legislator data shows that SAPs strongly predict whom lobbyists choose to target, and more so than congressional agendas alone can explain. Furthermore, SAPs predict more advocacy specifically by elite lobbying firms. These findings suggest that presidential position‐taking may elicit responses not only from Congress but also from organized interests and draw battle lines for both institutional and outside actors.

Presidential Studies QuarterlyVol. 56(1)
University of Nebraska at Omaha (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Presidential Messages on Legislation and the Congressional Targets of Lobbying — Huchen Liu · Presidential Studies Quarterly (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS