Evaluation of Strain and Charge‐Transfer Doping in Wet‐Polymeric Transferred Monolayer MoS <sub>2</sub> : Implications for Field Effect Transistors

ABSTRACT Unlike as‐grown two‐dimensional (2D) materials, transfer onto arbitrary substrates is essential for integration with semiconductor technologies, deterministic moiré superlattices, and flexible circuitry. However, polymeric residues introduced during the film‐transfer process critically modify strain and doping profiles, impeding device fidelity. We investigate the impact of polymer residues from two widely used 2D film transfer techniques: wet‐chemical etching (polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)‐based) and surface‐energy‐assisted transfer (polystyrene (PS)‐based) of monolayer MoS 2 (1L‐MoS 2 ) film. We demonstrate that PMMA residues induce biaxial tensile strain (0.07%) and p ‐type doping (hole density ∼0.74 × 10 13 cm −2 ) in residue‐covered regions, while uncovered areas exhibit compressive strain (0.11%). Conversely, PS residues nearly uniformly introduce compressive strain (0.17%) and n ‐type doping (electron density ∼0.89 × 10 13 cm −2 ). Kelvin probe force microscopy confirms polymer‐induced doping, and density functional theory calculations support the experimental observations. Field‐effect transistor measurements validate these doping trends, revealing p ‐type (threshold voltage −9.85 V) and n ‐type (threshold voltage −18.25 V) behavior for 1L‐MoS 2 channel material transferred using PMMA and PS polymers, respectively. The surface‐energy‐assisted transfer method minimizes structural defects, yielding superior device performance with higher ON/OFF ratios (10 6 ) and estimated mobility (10.3 cm 2 V −1 s −1 ). Our results demonstrate that the transfer methodology provides guidelines for optimizing 1L‐MoS 2 for high‐performance optoelectronic applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Materials Technologies
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.202501920
Primary Topic
2D Materials and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Strain and Charge‐Transfer Doping in Wet‐Polymeric Transferred Monolayer MoS 2 : Implications for Field Effect Transistors

Kishore K. Madapu, Jagnaseni Pradhan, C. Abinash Bhuyan, C. Ghosh et al.
Advanced Materials Technologies
2D Materials and Applications
article

Evaluation of Strain and Charge‐Transfer Doping in Wet‐Polymeric Transferred Monolayer MoS 2 : Implications for Field Effect Transistors

Kishore K. Madapu, Jagnaseni Pradhan, C. Abinash Bhuyan, C. Ghosh, Gurpreet Kaur, Shyam Kanta Sinha, Sandip Dhara, Shyamala Rao Polaki, Akhil R. Warrier, Krishna Murthy Prabakar
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Unlike as‐grown two‐dimensional (2D) materials, transfer onto arbitrary substrates is essential for integration with semiconductor technologies, deterministic moiré superlattices, and flexible circuitry. However, polymeric residues introduced during the film‐transfer process critically modify strain and doping profiles, impeding device fidelity. We investigate the impact of polymer residues from two widely used 2D film transfer techniques: wet‐chemical etching (polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)‐based) and surface‐energy‐assisted transfer (polystyrene (PS)‐based) of monolayer MoS 2 (1L‐MoS 2 ) film. We demonstrate that PMMA residues induce biaxial tensile strain (0.07%) and p ‐type doping (hole density ∼0.74 × 10 13 cm −2 ) in residue‐covered regions, while uncovered areas exhibit compressive strain (0.11%). Conversely, PS residues nearly uniformly introduce compressive strain (0.17%) and n ‐type doping (electron density ∼0.89 × 10 13 cm −2 ). Kelvin probe force microscopy confirms polymer‐induced doping, and density functional theory calculations support the experimental observations. Field‐effect transistor measurements validate these doping trends, revealing p ‐type (threshold voltage −9.85 V) and n ‐type (threshold voltage −18.25 V) behavior for 1L‐MoS 2 channel material transferred using PMMA and PS polymers, respectively. The surface‐energy‐assisted transfer method minimizes structural defects, yielding superior device performance with higher ON/OFF ratios (10 6 ) and estimated mobility (10.3 cm 2 V −1 s −1 ). Our results demonstrate that the transfer methodology provides guidelines for optimizing 1L‐MoS 2 for high‐performance optoelectronic applications.

Advanced Materials Technologies
Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research (IN)
Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
2D Materials and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.