Just culture and restorative just culture in healthcare settings: a scoping review of interventions, activities, factors and outcomes

Abstract Background Just culture and, more recently, restorative just culture interventions are increasingly recognised as nonpunitive approaches to the reporting of incidents in which healthcare professionals trust that they will receive fair treatment and support. However, despite this recognition, evidence concerning the range of interventions, implementation strategies and factors for successful outcomes supported by systematic approaches remains limited. This review sought to address this gap. Methods We searched PubMed, HBE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, Embase and grey literature from January 2000 to December 2024. We included peer-reviewed studies or quality improvement reports of any design and used an iterative, inductive approach to thematically categorise the data supplemented with descriptive statistics. Results We analysed 36 interventions across six thematic categories, which were a mix of just culture or restorative just culture interventions or existing safety interventions used to operationalise these approaches. Barriers and enablers to implementation included system improvements and accountability, a safe and supportive culture, leadership support, engagement and participation, organisational influences and external influences. Seven outcomes were identified: knowledge and confidence, communication and engagement in incident reporting, leadership engagement and support, shift towards a just, learning and safety culture, continuous improvement in processes, impact on patient safety outcomes and organisational benefits. A challenge was found in identifying the specific activities and factors contributing to the success of the interventions. Conclusions The interventions identified in this review are reflective of just culture and restorative just culture as a growing area in terms of quality and safety and incident management practices. The results suggest a number of preexisting safety interventions that can be used to operationalise these approaches, with restorative culture adding a further step of addressing the harm to the healthcare professional, crossing the boundaries of traditional patient safety functions to include Human Resources, Organisational Development and even Union functions. This review progresses the study of just culture and restorative just culture from a traditional quality improvement approach to implementation science. However, further work is needed to refine definitions to capture the extent and progress of preexisting work in this field and to develop implementation methodologies that identify relationships between interventions, barriers, enablers, outcomes and systematic methods for implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-14095-z
Primary Topic
Cultural Competency in Health Care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Just culture and restorative just culture in healthcare settings: a scoping review of interventions, activities, factors and outcomes

Amanda Oates, Nikki D’Souza, Kristina S. Brown, Gill Danby et al.
BMC Health Services Research
Cultural Competency in Health Care
article

Just culture and restorative just culture in healthcare settings: a scoping review of interventions, activities, factors and outcomes

Amanda Oates, Nikki D’Souza, Kristina S. Brown, Gill Danby, Louise Pramas, Anna Lewandowska, Stephen Teo, Rebecca Williamson, Cafer Deniz, Gillian Lewis, Charlotte Bourke, Sian Kitchen, Joanne Davidson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Just culture and, more recently, restorative just culture interventions are increasingly recognised as nonpunitive approaches to the reporting of incidents in which healthcare professionals trust that they will receive fair treatment and support. However, despite this recognition, evidence concerning the range of interventions, implementation strategies and factors for successful outcomes supported by systematic approaches remains limited. This review sought to address this gap. Methods We searched PubMed, HBE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, Embase and grey literature from January 2000 to December 2024. We included peer-reviewed studies or quality improvement reports of any design and used an iterative, inductive approach to thematically categorise the data supplemented with descriptive statistics. Results We analysed 36 interventions across six thematic categories, which were a mix of just culture or restorative just culture interventions or existing safety interventions used to operationalise these approaches. Barriers and enablers to implementation included system improvements and accountability, a safe and supportive culture, leadership support, engagement and participation, organisational influences and external influences. Seven outcomes were identified: knowledge and confidence, communication and engagement in incident reporting, leadership engagement and support, shift towards a just, learning and safety culture, continuous improvement in processes, impact on patient safety outcomes and organisational benefits. A challenge was found in identifying the specific activities and factors contributing to the success of the interventions. Conclusions The interventions identified in this review are reflective of just culture and restorative just culture as a growing area in terms of quality and safety and incident management practices. The results suggest a number of preexisting safety interventions that can be used to operationalise these approaches, with restorative culture adding a further step of addressing the harm to the healthcare professional, crossing the boundaries of traditional patient safety functions to include Human Resources, Organisational Development and even Union functions. This review progresses the study of just culture and restorative just culture from a traditional quality improvement approach to implementation science. However, further work is needed to refine definitions to capture the extent and progress of preexisting work in this field and to develop implementation methodologies that identify relationships between interventions, barriers, enablers, outcomes and systematic methods for implementation.

BMC Health Services ResearchVol. 26(1)
Ministry of Culture (IN), NHS Lothian (GB), Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (IE), La Trobe University (AU), Northumbria University (GB), National Patient Safety Agency (GB), Mersey Care NHS Trust (GB), Medicines Evaluation Unit (GB), National Patient Safety Foundation (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Cultural Competency in Health Care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.