Abstract TP133: Impact of Proximity to Certified Stroke Centers on Stroke Outcomes and Risk Profiles in the United States

Geographic disparity in stroke is well researched, with consensus being that greater distance from a certified stroke center (SC) is associated with worse outcomes. The extent to which geographic access interacts with other stroke risk factors remains unclear. This study investigates the impact of SC proximity on various comorbidity risk factors and stroke outcomes across the United States. This study analyzed 3,068 U.S. counties and 2,460 certified SCs. Data from the CDC Atlas of Heart Disease and Stroke and EMNet’s findERnow database informed this study. Metrics included distance from the center of a county to the nearest SC, stroke prevalence and mortality (per 100,000 people), comorbidity, and health utilization rates. Gamma regression was used to analyze across continuous distance and ordinal regression was used for categorized ranges. Both ischemic (RR 0.90, 95% CI [0.89, 0.92]; P<0.001) and hemorrhagic (RR 0.45, 95% CI [0.40, 0.51]; P<0.001) stroke prevalence were negatively associated with distance from a certified SC. Increased distance from a certified SC was positively correlated with coronary heart disease prevalence (OR 2.05, 95% CI [1.71, 2.46]; P<0.001) and negatively correlated with smoking prevalence (OR 0.93, 95% CI [0.90, 0.99]; P<0.001). Stroke prevalence for the total population was higher in counties with higher rates of obesity (RR 1.01, 95% CI [1.00, 1.02]; P=0.003), smoking (RR 4.04, 95% CI [2.50, 6.55]; P<0.001), and hypercholesterolemia (RR 3.12, 95%CI [1.80, 5.40]; P<0.001). Counties with high rates of regular cholesterol screening had decreased mortality from stroke (RR 0.98, 95% CI [0.97, 0.98]; P<0.001). These counties had no association with range from nearest SC (OR 0.97, 95% CI [0.92, 1.02]; P=0.214). Mortality rates for ischemic (RR 0.99, 95% CI [0.99,0.99]; P<0.001) but not hemorrhagic (RR 1.00, 95% CI [0.99, 1.00]; P=0.268) stroke were significantly correlated with SC distance. When stratifying for race, only Native American populations demonstrated higher mortality with increased SC distance (OR 1.14, 95% CI [1.03, 1.25]; P=0.009). Certain groups may face a higher mortality burden from stroke regardless of proximity to certified SCs. This could be due to lack of access to health screening and increased chronic disease burden, leading to more severe presentations to the hospital. Efforts to reduce stroke disparities should focus on prevention and access to care beyond geographic proximity to certified stroke centers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stroke
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/str.57.suppl_1.tp133
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract TP133: Impact of Proximity to Certified Stroke Centers on Stroke Outcomes and Risk Profiles in the United States

Carl Porto, Joshua Feler, Dylan Wolman, R Torabi et al.
Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

Abstract TP133: Impact of Proximity to Certified Stroke Centers on Stroke Outcomes and Risk Profiles in the United States

Carl Porto, Joshua Feler, Dylan Wolman, R Torabi, Krisztina Moldovan, Lohith Chatragadda, Abigail Teshome, Mazen Taman, Mahesh Jayaraman
article en

Abstract

Geographic disparity in stroke is well researched, with consensus being that greater distance from a certified stroke center (SC) is associated with worse outcomes. The extent to which geographic access interacts with other stroke risk factors remains unclear. This study investigates the impact of SC proximity on various comorbidity risk factors and stroke outcomes across the United States. This study analyzed 3,068 U.S. counties and 2,460 certified SCs. Data from the CDC Atlas of Heart Disease and Stroke and EMNet’s findERnow database informed this study. Metrics included distance from the center of a county to the nearest SC, stroke prevalence and mortality (per 100,000 people), comorbidity, and health utilization rates. Gamma regression was used to analyze across continuous distance and ordinal regression was used for categorized ranges. Both ischemic (RR 0.90, 95% CI [0.89, 0.92]; P<0.001) and hemorrhagic (RR 0.45, 95% CI [0.40, 0.51]; P<0.001) stroke prevalence were negatively associated with distance from a certified SC. Increased distance from a certified SC was positively correlated with coronary heart disease prevalence (OR 2.05, 95% CI [1.71, 2.46]; P<0.001) and negatively correlated with smoking prevalence (OR 0.93, 95% CI [0.90, 0.99]; P<0.001). Stroke prevalence for the total population was higher in counties with higher rates of obesity (RR 1.01, 95% CI [1.00, 1.02]; P=0.003), smoking (RR 4.04, 95% CI [2.50, 6.55]; P<0.001), and hypercholesterolemia (RR 3.12, 95%CI [1.80, 5.40]; P<0.001). Counties with high rates of regular cholesterol screening had decreased mortality from stroke (RR 0.98, 95% CI [0.97, 0.98]; P<0.001). These counties had no association with range from nearest SC (OR 0.97, 95% CI [0.92, 1.02]; P=0.214). Mortality rates for ischemic (RR 0.99, 95% CI [0.99,0.99]; P<0.001) but not hemorrhagic (RR 1.00, 95% CI [0.99, 1.00]; P=0.268) stroke were significantly correlated with SC distance. When stratifying for race, only Native American populations demonstrated higher mortality with increased SC distance (OR 1.14, 95% CI [1.03, 1.25]; P=0.009). Certain groups may face a higher mortality burden from stroke regardless of proximity to certified SCs. This could be due to lack of access to health screening and increased chronic disease burden, leading to more severe presentations to the hospital. Efforts to reduce stroke disparities should focus on prevention and access to care beyond geographic proximity to certified stroke centers.

StrokeVol. 57(Suppl_1)
University of Rhode Island (US), Providence College (US), Brown University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.