Best practice vs. reality: An exploratory study of communication dynamics during forensic dental and medical examinations in child abuse investigations

• Healthcare communication in child abuse cases is an under-researched area. • Healthcare professionals mostly use option-posing utterances. • Open-ended prompts, specifically invitations, were uncommon. • Best practice interviewing should be adapted for forensic health examinations. Forensic health examinations are a routine part of child abuse investigations, yet healthcare professionals may lack the skills required to communicate effectively with victims. Best practice interviewing techniques have been adopted in various professions, yet they have not been widely implemented among healthcare professionals. Little is known about the communication dynamics during forensic health examinations in relation to best practice interviewing principles. Participants included nine youths (aged 13–16) and eight healthcare professionals involved in forensic dental and medical examinations carried out as part of child abuse investigations. Using a hybrid content analysis approach supplemented by inductive coding, healthcare professionals’ utterances were coded to identify the use of open-ended or closed-ended statements. Children’s responses were categorised as descriptive, “don’t know,” or yes/no. The length of each utterance or response was measured by word count. Preliminary revealed that healthcare professionals primarily used option-posing utterances, while invitations were used in only 0.6% of cases. Conversations also lacked a clear structure, with key components such as introductory statements and ground rules inconsistently applied. This study highlights the need to establish best practice interviewing techniques tailored for healthcare settings. Given their crucial role in child abuse investigations, healthcare professionals should receive training in evidence-based communication strategies. Implementing structured interviewing protocols in medical and dental contexts could improve information gathering while ensuring child-centred, ethical, and supportive interactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Children and Youth Services Review
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2026.108786
Primary Topic
Child Abuse and Related Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Best practice vs. reality: An exploratory study of communication dynamics during forensic dental and medical examinations in child abuse investigations

Miriam S. Johnson, Gunn Astrid Baugerud, Unni-Mette Stamnes Köpp, Hayley Manalang Ko et al.
Children and Youth Services Review
Child Abuse and Related Trauma
article

Best practice vs. reality: An exploratory study of communication dynamics during forensic dental and medical examinations in child abuse investigations

Miriam S. Johnson, Gunn Astrid Baugerud, Unni-Mette Stamnes Köpp, Hayley Manalang Ko, Ewa A. Szyszko Hovden
article en

Abstract

• Healthcare communication in child abuse cases is an under-researched area. • Healthcare professionals mostly use option-posing utterances. • Open-ended prompts, specifically invitations, were uncommon. • Best practice interviewing should be adapted for forensic health examinations. Forensic health examinations are a routine part of child abuse investigations, yet healthcare professionals may lack the skills required to communicate effectively with victims. Best practice interviewing techniques have been adopted in various professions, yet they have not been widely implemented among healthcare professionals. Little is known about the communication dynamics during forensic health examinations in relation to best practice interviewing principles. Participants included nine youths (aged 13–16) and eight healthcare professionals involved in forensic dental and medical examinations carried out as part of child abuse investigations. Using a hybrid content analysis approach supplemented by inductive coding, healthcare professionals’ utterances were coded to identify the use of open-ended or closed-ended statements. Children’s responses were categorised as descriptive, “don’t know,” or yes/no. The length of each utterance or response was measured by word count. Preliminary revealed that healthcare professionals primarily used option-posing utterances, while invitations were used in only 0.6% of cases. Conversations also lacked a clear structure, with key components such as introductory statements and ground rules inconsistently applied. This study highlights the need to establish best practice interviewing techniques tailored for healthcare settings. Given their crucial role in child abuse investigations, healthcare professionals should receive training in evidence-based communication strategies. Implementing structured interviewing protocols in medical and dental contexts could improve information gathering while ensuring child-centred, ethical, and supportive interactions.

Children and Youth Services ReviewVol. 182
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO), University of Oslo (NO), Hospital of Southern Norway (NO)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Child Abuse and Related Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.