Ignoring deaths, benefiting polluters: EPA discards science on pollution harms

Changes in the US Environmental Protection Agency’s regulatory methods prioritise the interests of polluting industries at the expense of public health, say <b>Gretchen Goldman and colleagues</b>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s192
Primary Topic
Air Quality and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ignoring deaths, benefiting polluters: EPA discards science on pollution harms

Kristie Ellickson, G. T. Goldman, Rachel Cleetus
BMJ
Air Quality and Health Impacts
article

Ignoring deaths, benefiting polluters: EPA discards science on pollution harms

Kristie Ellickson, G. T. Goldman, Rachel Cleetus
article en

Abstract

Changes in the US Environmental Protection Agency’s regulatory methods prioritise the interests of polluting industries at the expense of public health, say <b>Gretchen Goldman and colleagues</b>

BMJVol. 392
Union of Concerned Scientists (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Air Quality and Health Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.