Abstract TP241: Redefining Ischemic Core, Penumbra, and Target Mismatch on CT Perfusion in Acute Anterior Distal Medium Vessel Occlusions

Background: Recent trials of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute distal medium vessel occlusions (DMVOs) were negative but also used inconsistent imaging-based inclusion criteria, whereas many successful large vessel occlusion (LVO) EVT trials used empirically validated CT perfusion-based target mismatch (TMM) criteria: an ischemic penumbra (time-to-maximum [Tmax] >6s) to core (relative cerebral blood flow [rCBF] <30%) mismatch ratio (MMR) ≥1.8 and volume (MMV) ≥15mL. We aimed to determine optimal corresponding definitions in DMVOs to improve patient selection for EVT. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with acute anterior DMVOs from prospectively collected databases at four comprehensive stroke centers. To assess core, we evaluated how well pretreatment rCBF <20%, <30%, <34%, and <38% volumes correlated with MRI-based posttreatment follow-up volumes (FIVs) in successfully recanalized patients. To evaluate penumbra, we assessed how well pretreatment Tmax >4s, >6s, >8s, and >10s volumes correlated with FIVs in unrecanalized patients. Then, we evaluated whether these improved parameters for core and penumbra better quantified LVO TMM and identified an optimal DMVO TMM definition. Results: In 122 core patients, rCBF <38% most strongly correlated with FIVs (concordance correlation coefficient [CCC] 0.30 [95% CI, 0.15-0.48]), outperforming rCBF <30% (CCC 0.21 [0.10-0.35]) (p < 0.001). In 70 penumbra patients, Tmax >8s most strongly correlated with FIVs (CCC 0.49 [0.25-0.77]), outperforming Tmax >6s (CCC 0.39 [0.17-0.68]) (p < 0.001). In 180 patients undergoing EVT with Tmax >6s to rCBF <30% MMR ≥1.8 and MMV ≥15mL, recomputing MMR and MMV using Tmax >8s and rCBF <38% further separated those with favorable outcomes (p = 0.007). In the same cohort, Tmax >8s to rCBF <38% MMR ≥2.2 and MMV ≥10mL maximized the number of patients benefitted (p < 0.001, absolute risk reduction 26%). Conclusions: In acute anterior DMVOs, rCBF <38% and Tmax >8s best correspond to ischemic core and penumbra, respectively; more favorably quantify LVO TMM, and reveal optimal TMM criteria. These results should be prospectively investigated as inclusion criteria for EVT in this population and suggest recent negative DMVO EVT trials may have been confounded by suboptimal patient selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stroke
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/str.57.suppl_1.tp241
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract TP241: Redefining Ischemic Core, Penumbra, and Target Mismatch on CT Perfusion in Acute Anterior Distal Medium Vessel Occlusions

Dhairya A. Lakhani, Kambiz Nael, Hillis Ae, Cynthia Greene et al.
Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

Abstract TP241: Redefining Ischemic Core, Penumbra, and Target Mismatch on CT Perfusion in Acute Anterior Distal Medium Vessel Occlusions

Dhairya A. Lakhani, Kambiz Nael, Hillis Ae, Cynthia Greene, Tobias Faizy, Jeremy J. Heit, Vivek Yedavalli
article en

Abstract

Background: Recent trials of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute distal medium vessel occlusions (DMVOs) were negative but also used inconsistent imaging-based inclusion criteria, whereas many successful large vessel occlusion (LVO) EVT trials used empirically validated CT perfusion-based target mismatch (TMM) criteria: an ischemic penumbra (time-to-maximum [Tmax] >6s) to core (relative cerebral blood flow [rCBF] <30%) mismatch ratio (MMR) ≥1.8 and volume (MMV) ≥15mL. We aimed to determine optimal corresponding definitions in DMVOs to improve patient selection for EVT. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with acute anterior DMVOs from prospectively collected databases at four comprehensive stroke centers. To assess core, we evaluated how well pretreatment rCBF <20%, <30%, <34%, and <38% volumes correlated with MRI-based posttreatment follow-up volumes (FIVs) in successfully recanalized patients. To evaluate penumbra, we assessed how well pretreatment Tmax >4s, >6s, >8s, and >10s volumes correlated with FIVs in unrecanalized patients. Then, we evaluated whether these improved parameters for core and penumbra better quantified LVO TMM and identified an optimal DMVO TMM definition. Results: In 122 core patients, rCBF <38% most strongly correlated with FIVs (concordance correlation coefficient [CCC] 0.30 [95% CI, 0.15-0.48]), outperforming rCBF <30% (CCC 0.21 [0.10-0.35]) (p < 0.001). In 70 penumbra patients, Tmax >8s most strongly correlated with FIVs (CCC 0.49 [0.25-0.77]), outperforming Tmax >6s (CCC 0.39 [0.17-0.68]) (p < 0.001). In 180 patients undergoing EVT with Tmax >6s to rCBF <30% MMR ≥1.8 and MMV ≥15mL, recomputing MMR and MMV using Tmax >8s and rCBF <38% further separated those with favorable outcomes (p = 0.007). In the same cohort, Tmax >8s to rCBF <38% MMR ≥2.2 and MMV ≥10mL maximized the number of patients benefitted (p < 0.001, absolute risk reduction 26%). Conclusions: In acute anterior DMVOs, rCBF <38% and Tmax >8s best correspond to ischemic core and penumbra, respectively; more favorably quantify LVO TMM, and reveal optimal TMM criteria. These results should be prospectively investigated as inclusion criteria for EVT in this population and suggest recent negative DMVO EVT trials may have been confounded by suboptimal patient selection.

StrokeVol. 57(Suppl_1)
West Virginia University (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), City College of San Francisco (US), Palo Alto University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), University Hospital Münster (DE), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.