On the Coexistence of Captions and Sign Language as Accessibility Solutions in Educational Settings

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> In mainstream educational settings, deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) students may have limited or no access to the spoken lectures and discussions that are central to the hearing majority classroom. Yet, engagement in these educational and social exchanges is fundamental to their learning and inclusion. Two primary visual accessibility solutions can support this need: real-time speech-to-text transcriptions (i.e., captioning) and high-quality sign language interpreting. Their combined use (or coexistence), however, raises concerns of competition between concurrent streams of visual information. This article examines the empirical evidence concerning the effectiveness of using both captioning and sign language simultaneously in educational settings. Specifically, it investigates whether this combined approach leads to better or worse content learning for DHH students, when compared to using either visual accessibility solution in isolation. <b>Methods:</b> A review of all English language studies in peer-reviewed journals until August 2025 was performed. Eligible studies used an experimental design to compare content learning when using sign language and captions together, versus using sign language or captions on their own. <b>Databases Reviewed:</b> EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, and PsycInfo. <b>Results:</b> A total of four studies met the criteria for inclusion. This limited evidence is insufficient to decide on the coexistence of captioning and sign language. Yet, it underscores the potential of captions for content access in education for DHH, even when sign language is available. <b>Conclusions:</b> The present article reveals the lack of evidence in favor or against its coexistence with sign language. With the aim to be constructive for future research, the discussion offers considerations on the attentional demands of simultaneous visual accessibility resources, the diversity of DHH learners, and the impact of current and forthcoming technological advancements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Audiology Research
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres16010020
Primary Topic
Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Coexistence of Captions and Sign Language as Accessibility Solutions in Educational Settings

Francesco Pavani, Valerio Leonetti
Audiology Research
Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
article

On the Coexistence of Captions and Sign Language as Accessibility Solutions in Educational Settings

Francesco Pavani, Valerio Leonetti
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> In mainstream educational settings, deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) students may have limited or no access to the spoken lectures and discussions that are central to the hearing majority classroom. Yet, engagement in these educational and social exchanges is fundamental to their learning and inclusion. Two primary visual accessibility solutions can support this need: real-time speech-to-text transcriptions (i.e., captioning) and high-quality sign language interpreting. Their combined use (or coexistence), however, raises concerns of competition between concurrent streams of visual information. This article examines the empirical evidence concerning the effectiveness of using both captioning and sign language simultaneously in educational settings. Specifically, it investigates whether this combined approach leads to better or worse content learning for DHH students, when compared to using either visual accessibility solution in isolation. <b>Methods:</b> A review of all English language studies in peer-reviewed journals until August 2025 was performed. Eligible studies used an experimental design to compare content learning when using sign language and captions together, versus using sign language or captions on their own. <b>Databases Reviewed:</b> EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, and PsycInfo. <b>Results:</b> A total of four studies met the criteria for inclusion. This limited evidence is insufficient to decide on the coexistence of captioning and sign language. Yet, it underscores the potential of captions for content access in education for DHH, even when sign language is available. <b>Conclusions:</b> The present article reveals the lack of evidence in favor or against its coexistence with sign language. With the aim to be constructive for future research, the discussion offers considerations on the attentional demands of simultaneous visual accessibility resources, the diversity of DHH learners, and the impact of current and forthcoming technological advancements.

Audiology ResearchVol. 16(1)
University of Cagliari (IT), University of Trento (IT), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Cagliari (IT), Centro Interuniversitario di Ricerca Per lo Sviluppo sostenibile (IT)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.