Abstract WP345: Blood Pressure Control Post-Endovascular Stroke Treatment: Evidence from an Updated Meta-Analysis of Functional and Safety Outcomes

Background: Previous meta-analyses evaluating blood pressure (BP) management following endovascular stroke treatment (EVT) demonstrated a non-significant effect on all-cause mortality (OR 1.30; 95% CI 0.98–1.71). The recently published IDENTITY trial, a randomized controlled study, provides new data that may influence these findings. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all six published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 1,945 patients) comparing: Intensive BP control: target systolic BP <130 mmHg Conventional BP control: target systolic BP 140–180 mmHg Primary outcomes were 90-day all-cause mortality and functional independence (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0–2). Secondary outcomes included unfavorable recovery (mRS 3–6), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and malignant edema. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Results: Mortality: In prior analyses, mortality differences were non-significant (OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.98–1.71). Incorporating IDENTITY trial data rendered the mortality difference statistically significant, with 26% higher mortality in the conventional BP group (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.00–1.60; p = 0.05, corresponding to a 21% mortality reduction with intensive BP control (1/1.26 = 0.79). Functional Outcomes: Intensive BP control was associated with 32% lower odds of good functional outcome (mRS 0–2) (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.57–0.82; p < 0.001) and 47% higher odds of unfavorable recovery (mRS 3–6) (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.23–1.77). Safety Outcomes: No significant differences were found in sICH (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.84–1.65) or any ICH (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.91–1.32). A non-significant trend toward higher malignant edema was observed with intensive BP control (OR 1.86, 95% CI 0.94–3.68). Conclusion: This updated meta-analysis of six RCTs, including the IDENTITY trial, indicates that intensive BP management after EVT significantly reduces all-cause mortality but is associated with worse functional outcomes. Safety outcomes remain largely unchanged. These findings underscore the complexity of post-EVT BP management and the need for further trials to determine optimal treatment strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stroke
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/str.57.suppl_1.wp345
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract WP345: Blood Pressure Control Post-Endovascular Stroke Treatment: Evidence from an Updated Meta-Analysis of Functional and Safety Outcomes

Sherif Eltawansy, Muhammad Affan, Muhammad Waseem Tahir, Zubia tahir
Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

Abstract WP345: Blood Pressure Control Post-Endovascular Stroke Treatment: Evidence from an Updated Meta-Analysis of Functional and Safety Outcomes

Sherif Eltawansy, Muhammad Affan, Muhammad Waseem Tahir, Zubia tahir
article en

Abstract

Background: Previous meta-analyses evaluating blood pressure (BP) management following endovascular stroke treatment (EVT) demonstrated a non-significant effect on all-cause mortality (OR 1.30; 95% CI 0.98–1.71). The recently published IDENTITY trial, a randomized controlled study, provides new data that may influence these findings. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all six published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 1,945 patients) comparing: Intensive BP control: target systolic BP <130 mmHg Conventional BP control: target systolic BP 140–180 mmHg Primary outcomes were 90-day all-cause mortality and functional independence (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0–2). Secondary outcomes included unfavorable recovery (mRS 3–6), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and malignant edema. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Results: Mortality: In prior analyses, mortality differences were non-significant (OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.98–1.71). Incorporating IDENTITY trial data rendered the mortality difference statistically significant, with 26% higher mortality in the conventional BP group (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.00–1.60; p = 0.05, corresponding to a 21% mortality reduction with intensive BP control (1/1.26 = 0.79). Functional Outcomes: Intensive BP control was associated with 32% lower odds of good functional outcome (mRS 0–2) (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.57–0.82; p < 0.001) and 47% higher odds of unfavorable recovery (mRS 3–6) (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.23–1.77). Safety Outcomes: No significant differences were found in sICH (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.84–1.65) or any ICH (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.91–1.32). A non-significant trend toward higher malignant edema was observed with intensive BP control (OR 1.86, 95% CI 0.94–3.68). Conclusion: This updated meta-analysis of six RCTs, including the IDENTITY trial, indicates that intensive BP management after EVT significantly reduces all-cause mortality but is associated with worse functional outcomes. Safety outcomes remain largely unchanged. These findings underscore the complexity of post-EVT BP management and the need for further trials to determine optimal treatment strategies.

StrokeVol. 57(Suppl_1)
SUNY Upstate Medical University (US), Guthrie Robert Packer Hospital (US), Jersey Shore University Medical Center (US), Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PK), University of Missouri (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.