Code Status Decisions for End-Stage Cancer—Resolving the Ethical Dissonance

This Viewpoint discusses discordance in code status decisions between clinicians and patients with end-stage cancer and provides ethical frameworks for its resolution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Oncology
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.6100
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Code Status Decisions for End-Stage Cancer—Resolving the Ethical Dissonance

Ryan Pferdehirt, Fawad A. Khan, Mohammed S. Khan
JAMA Oncology
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Code Status Decisions for End-Stage Cancer—Resolving the Ethical Dissonance

Ryan Pferdehirt, Fawad A. Khan, Mohammed S. Khan
article en

Abstract

This Viewpoint discusses discordance in code status decisions between clinicians and patients with end-stage cancer and provides ethical frameworks for its resolution.

JAMA OncologyVol. 12(3)
Ochsner Health System (US), The University of Queensland (AU), Center for Practical Bioethics (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
DOISourceOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Code Status Decisions for End-Stage Cancer—Resolving the Ethical Dissonance — Ryan Pferdehirt, Fawad A. Khan, et al. · JAMA Oncology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS