Abstract A107: Endovascular Treatment Improves Cognitive Function in Non-Acute Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background: Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is a significant risk factor for cognitive impairment, likely via hypoperfusion. Despite the growing number of studies on ICAS, the efficacy of endovascular treatment (EVT) in improving the cognitive function of ICAS patients remains uncertain. This study aims to explore (1) whether EVT can improve the cognitive function of ICAS patients, (2) the correlation between cerebral perfusion and cognitive impairment. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study (NCT06336174) of non-acute anterior circulation ICAS patients, assigned to EVT plus best medical treatment (EVT group) or best medical treatment alone (BMT group). Cognitive function was assessed using a battery of neuropsychological tests, and cerebral blood flow (CBF) was quantified using pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling at baseline and 3-month follow-up. The efficacy of EVT on cognitive function was evaluated using linear mixed-effects models (LMM). Pearson correlation analysis was used to assess the correlation between cognitive changes and perfusion changes. Multivariate linear regression (MLR) was used to identify the predictors of cognitive improvement (Figure 1). Results: 106 participants completed the follow-up, with the BMT group (n = 62, 42 males, age 55.62 ± 9.79, education 6.97 ± 3.76), and the EVT group (n = 44, 35 males, age 57.95 ± 8.20, education 6.42 ± 2.74). LMM analysis showed significant group × time interactions in immediate verbal memory (Auditory Verbal Learning Test, AVLT-immediate, F = 6.777, p = 0.011), working memory (Digit Span Test backward, F = 8.036, p = 0.005), and frontal lobe fluency (Verbal Fluency Test, semantic-VFT, F = 8.345, p = 0.005), which were primarily driven by significant improvements in the EVT group, as well as inter-group differences at follow-up (Figure 2). The EVT group showed significant improvement in CBF at follow-up, and this was correlated with better semantic-VFT performance (r = 0.568, p = 0.017) (Figure 3). MLR analysis showed that EVT improved neuropsychological scores, with greater effects in those with lower baseline scores. Conclusions: Endovascular treatment significantly improved cognitive function in non-acute ICAS patients, associated with the improvement in CBF, particularly in those with worse baseline cognitive performance. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up are needed to confirm the long-term benefits and to explore the underlying mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stroke
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/str.57.suppl_1.a107
Primary Topic
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract A107: Endovascular Treatment Improves Cognitive Function in Non-Acute Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study

Baogen Du, Shanshan Cao, Qiang Wei, Kai Wang et al.
Stroke
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
article

Abstract A107: Endovascular Treatment Improves Cognitive Function in Non-Acute Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study

Baogen Du, Shanshan Cao, Qiang Wei, Kai Wang, Wenchen Sun, Shihao Ruan, Shuiping Wang, Panpan Hu
article en

Abstract

Background: Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is a significant risk factor for cognitive impairment, likely via hypoperfusion. Despite the growing number of studies on ICAS, the efficacy of endovascular treatment (EVT) in improving the cognitive function of ICAS patients remains uncertain. This study aims to explore (1) whether EVT can improve the cognitive function of ICAS patients, (2) the correlation between cerebral perfusion and cognitive impairment. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study (NCT06336174) of non-acute anterior circulation ICAS patients, assigned to EVT plus best medical treatment (EVT group) or best medical treatment alone (BMT group). Cognitive function was assessed using a battery of neuropsychological tests, and cerebral blood flow (CBF) was quantified using pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling at baseline and 3-month follow-up. The efficacy of EVT on cognitive function was evaluated using linear mixed-effects models (LMM). Pearson correlation analysis was used to assess the correlation between cognitive changes and perfusion changes. Multivariate linear regression (MLR) was used to identify the predictors of cognitive improvement (Figure 1). Results: 106 participants completed the follow-up, with the BMT group (n = 62, 42 males, age 55.62 ± 9.79, education 6.97 ± 3.76), and the EVT group (n = 44, 35 males, age 57.95 ± 8.20, education 6.42 ± 2.74). LMM analysis showed significant group × time interactions in immediate verbal memory (Auditory Verbal Learning Test, AVLT-immediate, F = 6.777, p = 0.011), working memory (Digit Span Test backward, F = 8.036, p = 0.005), and frontal lobe fluency (Verbal Fluency Test, semantic-VFT, F = 8.345, p = 0.005), which were primarily driven by significant improvements in the EVT group, as well as inter-group differences at follow-up (Figure 2). The EVT group showed significant improvement in CBF at follow-up, and this was correlated with better semantic-VFT performance (r = 0.568, p = 0.017) (Figure 3). MLR analysis showed that EVT improved neuropsychological scores, with greater effects in those with lower baseline scores. Conclusions: Endovascular treatment significantly improved cognitive function in non-acute ICAS patients, associated with the improvement in CBF, particularly in those with worse baseline cognitive performance. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up are needed to confirm the long-term benefits and to explore the underlying mechanisms.

StrokeVol. 57(Suppl_1)
Anhui Medical University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.