A Mixed-Methods Analysis of the Outcomes of a Peer Review Mentoring Program
The qualitative findings suggest that the RMP enhances reviewing capabilities, as well as confidence among peer reviewers, despite no statistically significant findings in the quantitative analysis. Moreover, the Mentees' feedback will be helpful in further enhancing the RMP for future cohorts.
Authors
- Aleda M.H. Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4636-8260)
- Radhika Devraj (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8604-4949)
- Michelle L. Blakely (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9946-5187)
- Jonathan Thigpen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0043-5891)
- Kevin Astle (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9807-4731)
- Surajit Dey
Institutions
- Roosevelt University (US)
- University of North Texas (US)
- University of North Texas Health Science Center (US)
- Roseman University of Health Sciences (US)
- University of South Florida (US)
- University of North Texas System (US)
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
- Samford University (US)
- Southern Illinois University Edwardsville (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
- Published
- 2026-01-30
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2026.101936
- Primary Topic
- Mentoring and Academic Development
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00