Abstract WP034: Prehospital Thrombolysis on the Mobile Stroke Unit: A Comparative Analysis of Tenecteplase vs Alteplase

Background: Tenecteplase (TNK) has increasingly replaced alteplase (tPA) as the intravenous thrombolytic (IVT) of choice in acute ischemic stroke due to its longer half-life, greater fibrin specificity and single-bolus administration. We compared TNK and tPA administration in the prehospital setting using mobile stroke units (MSU). Objective: To compare TNK and tPA on MSU door to IVT and alarm to IVT times in the MSU setting and the rates of functional stroke outcomes. Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective review of patients treated with IVT on the MSU, comparing those who received tPA (2018-2022) with those who received TNK (2022-2025). Outcomes included MSU door-to-IVT and alarm-to-IVT times, acute hospital discharge destination, hospital discharge NIHSS and mRS, and follow-up mRS (30- and 90-day). Unadjusted comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Generalized linear regression models were applied to evaluate IVT timing metrics, adjusting for confounders. Results: A total of 130 patients were included; 65 received TNK and 65 tPA. There were no significant differences in the MSU door-to-IVT (median 21 vs 19 min) and alarm-to-IVT (median 42 vs 39 min) times between the two groups. Outcomes were similar between TNK and tPA across discharge NIHSS (median 2 (interquartile range (IQR) 0-4) vs 2.5 (IQR0-8)), discharge mRS (median 2 (IQR 1-3) vs 3.00 (IQR 1-4)) vs 2.5 (IQR 0-4)). However, a significant difference was observed in 30-day mRS (median 2 (IQR 1- 4) vs 0 (IQR 0-2)). There was no significant difference in the rates of radiographic parenchymal hemorrhage (PH1 and PH2) on the 24 hour repeat CT Head between TNK (6.9%) and tPA (6.2%) groups. Discussion: In this single-center MSU cohort, TNK and tPA demonstrated comparable treatment times and functional outcomes in the prehospital setting. While TNK offers logistic advantages in administration, our findings suggest no meaningful differences in time-to-treatment or most clinical outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stroke
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/str.57.suppl_1.wp034
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract WP034: Prehospital Thrombolysis on the Mobile Stroke Unit: A Comparative Analysis of Tenecteplase vs Alteplase

Himani Sancheti, Sidonie Ibrikji, Stephen J. Trudeau, Kajal S. Patel et al.
Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

Abstract WP034: Prehospital Thrombolysis on the Mobile Stroke Unit: A Comparative Analysis of Tenecteplase vs Alteplase

Himani Sancheti, Sidonie Ibrikji, Stephen J. Trudeau, Kajal S. Patel, Ken Uchino, Justin Pearce, Kevin Mawby, Alexandra Sorohan, Holly Moster, Brittany Lapin
article en

Abstract

Background: Tenecteplase (TNK) has increasingly replaced alteplase (tPA) as the intravenous thrombolytic (IVT) of choice in acute ischemic stroke due to its longer half-life, greater fibrin specificity and single-bolus administration. We compared TNK and tPA administration in the prehospital setting using mobile stroke units (MSU). Objective: To compare TNK and tPA on MSU door to IVT and alarm to IVT times in the MSU setting and the rates of functional stroke outcomes. Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective review of patients treated with IVT on the MSU, comparing those who received tPA (2018-2022) with those who received TNK (2022-2025). Outcomes included MSU door-to-IVT and alarm-to-IVT times, acute hospital discharge destination, hospital discharge NIHSS and mRS, and follow-up mRS (30- and 90-day). Unadjusted comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Generalized linear regression models were applied to evaluate IVT timing metrics, adjusting for confounders. Results: A total of 130 patients were included; 65 received TNK and 65 tPA. There were no significant differences in the MSU door-to-IVT (median 21 vs 19 min) and alarm-to-IVT (median 42 vs 39 min) times between the two groups. Outcomes were similar between TNK and tPA across discharge NIHSS (median 2 (interquartile range (IQR) 0-4) vs 2.5 (IQR0-8)), discharge mRS (median 2 (IQR 1-3) vs 3.00 (IQR 1-4)) vs 2.5 (IQR 0-4)). However, a significant difference was observed in 30-day mRS (median 2 (IQR 1- 4) vs 0 (IQR 0-2)). There was no significant difference in the rates of radiographic parenchymal hemorrhage (PH1 and PH2) on the 24 hour repeat CT Head between TNK (6.9%) and tPA (6.2%) groups. Discussion: In this single-center MSU cohort, TNK and tPA demonstrated comparable treatment times and functional outcomes in the prehospital setting. While TNK offers logistic advantages in administration, our findings suggest no meaningful differences in time-to-treatment or most clinical outcomes.

StrokeVol. 57(Suppl_1)
Cleveland Clinic (US), Cleveland Foundation (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.