More is worse! overlooking the ecological risk of chemical pollution-induced proliferation in aquatic systems

Abstract Ecotoxicological evaluations focus on lethality and growth inhibition. when no inhibitory effect is observed, particularly for organisms considered “non-target” like algae, the lethality and growth inhibition metrics are often reported as “greater than” the highest tested concentration. However, this approach critically overlooks the phenomenon of growth stimulation, a direct biological effect that can pose an equal or even greater ecological risk than inhibition. This comment argues for a crucial paradigm shift in ecological risk assessment to explicitly acknowledge, quantify, and incorporate growth-promoting effects. Given that protocols already mandate the reporting of such stimulation, it is imperative to treat it with the same quantitative rigor as growth inhibition, thereby ensuring a more comprehensive and accurate understanding of chemical impacts on aquatic ecosystems.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Sciences Europe
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-025-01322-3
Primary Topic
Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

More is worse! overlooking the ecological risk of chemical pollution-induced proliferation in aquatic systems

Verónica Laura Lozano
Environmental Sciences Europe
Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
article

More is worse! overlooking the ecological risk of chemical pollution-induced proliferation in aquatic systems

Verónica Laura Lozano
article en

Abstract

Abstract Ecotoxicological evaluations focus on lethality and growth inhibition. when no inhibitory effect is observed, particularly for organisms considered “non-target” like algae, the lethality and growth inhibition metrics are often reported as “greater than” the highest tested concentration. However, this approach critically overlooks the phenomenon of growth stimulation, a direct biological effect that can pose an equal or even greater ecological risk than inhibition. This comment argues for a crucial paradigm shift in ecological risk assessment to explicitly acknowledge, quantify, and incorporate growth-promoting effects. Given that protocols already mandate the reporting of such stimulation, it is imperative to treat it with the same quantitative rigor as growth inhibition, thereby ensuring a more comprehensive and accurate understanding of chemical impacts on aquatic ecosystems.

Environmental Sciences EuropeVol. 38(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.