Developing an advanced risk stratification model for pediatric intracranial ependymoma based on the prospective trial E-HIT2000 and subsequent registries

Background: Current treatment strategies for pediatric intracranial ependymoma do not consider molecular heterogeneity. Here, we evaluated molecular group-specific determinants of outcome and developed an improved risk stratification model. Methods: Patients aged 0-21 years with localized intracranial ependymoma were enrolled into the prospective clinical trial E-HIT2000. Treatment included maximum safe surgery, local radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, stratified according to age, histology and, following a major amendment, residual tumor. Clinical data were analyzed in a pooled molecularly annotated cohort with data from patients treated analogously within subsequent registries. Results: For 291 trial patients, the 5-year PFS and OS were 62±3% and 81±2%, respectively. For the molecularly annotated pooled cohort (n = 228), 5-year PFS/OS were: EPN-PFA (n = 146): 45±4%/77±4%; EPN-PFB (n = 19): 90±7%/100%; EPN-ZFTA (n = 59): 64±7%/86±5%; EPN-YAP1 (n = 4): 50±25%/100%. Patients with EPN-PFA without molecular risk factors (1q gain, and/or subtype EPN-PFA1c/d/e,2a), with complete resection, and postoperative radiotherapy showed favorable outcomes (5-year PFS/OS 75±10%/92±7%). For patients with EPN-PFA with molecular risk factors, prognosis was poor irrespective of residual tumor status (5-year PFS/OS: 33±6%/64±6%). Among EPN-ZFTA, 11/59 tumors were classified as EPN-ZFTA with alternative fusions, associated with inferior PFS (5-year PFS/OS: 36±15%/91±9%). For EPN-ZFTA-RELA, homozygous deletions of CDKN2A were associated with unfavorable outcomes (4-year PFS/OS: 19±16%/57±18% vs. 79±7%/97±3%, p = 0.0001). Finally, we developed a novel stratification model that discriminates standard and intermediate risk patients from those at high risk (p < 0.0001 for PFS and OS). Conclusions: These results strongly suggest the inclusion of molecular parameters into stratification, and the use of distinct treatment strategies within future ependymoma trials.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-283521
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing an advanced risk stratification model for pediatric intracranial ependymoma based on the prospective trial E-HIT2000 and subsequent registries

Janna Wenning, Andreas Beilken, David R. Ghasemi, Denise Obrecht et al.
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Developing an advanced risk stratification model for pediatric intracranial ependymoma based on the prospective trial E-HIT2000 and subsequent registries

Janna Wenning, Andreas Beilken, David R. Ghasemi, Denise Obrecht, Jörg Felsberg, Martin Mynarek, Irene Schmid, Björn O Juhnke, et al., Roland Coras, Ingmar Blümcke, Elisabeth Rushing, Norbert Graf, Michael C Frühwald, Pablo Hernáiz Driever, Katja von Hoff, Gudrun Fleischhack, Nicolas U. Gerber, Martin Benesch, Brigitte Bison, Markus Bergmann, Beate Timmermann, Kathy Keyvani, Irene Slavc, Andreas Faldum, Guido Reifenberger, Christian Hagel, Arend Koch, Stephan Tippelt, Martin Ebinger
article en

Abstract

Background: Current treatment strategies for pediatric intracranial ependymoma do not consider molecular heterogeneity. Here, we evaluated molecular group-specific determinants of outcome and developed an improved risk stratification model. Methods: Patients aged 0-21 years with localized intracranial ependymoma were enrolled into the prospective clinical trial E-HIT2000. Treatment included maximum safe surgery, local radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, stratified according to age, histology and, following a major amendment, residual tumor. Clinical data were analyzed in a pooled molecularly annotated cohort with data from patients treated analogously within subsequent registries. Results: For 291 trial patients, the 5-year PFS and OS were 62±3% and 81±2%, respectively. For the molecularly annotated pooled cohort (n = 228), 5-year PFS/OS were: EPN-PFA (n = 146): 45±4%/77±4%; EPN-PFB (n = 19): 90±7%/100%; EPN-ZFTA (n = 59): 64±7%/86±5%; EPN-YAP1 (n = 4): 50±25%/100%. Patients with EPN-PFA without molecular risk factors (1q gain, and/or subtype EPN-PFA1c/d/e,2a), with complete resection, and postoperative radiotherapy showed favorable outcomes (5-year PFS/OS 75±10%/92±7%). For patients with EPN-PFA with molecular risk factors, prognosis was poor irrespective of residual tumor status (5-year PFS/OS: 33±6%/64±6%). Among EPN-ZFTA, 11/59 tumors were classified as EPN-ZFTA with alternative fusions, associated with inferior PFS (5-year PFS/OS: 36±15%/91±9%). For EPN-ZFTA-RELA, homozygous deletions of CDKN2A were associated with unfavorable outcomes (4-year PFS/OS: 19±16%/57±18% vs. 79±7%/97±3%, p = 0.0001). Finally, we developed a novel stratification model that discriminates standard and intermediate risk patients from those at high risk (p < 0.0001 for PFS and OS). Conclusions: These results strongly suggest the inclusion of molecular parameters into stratification, and the use of distinct treatment strategies within future ependymoma trials.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.