Developing an advanced risk stratification model for pediatric intracranial ependymoma based on the prospective trial E-HIT2000 and subsequent registries
Background: Current treatment strategies for pediatric intracranial ependymoma do not consider molecular heterogeneity. Here, we evaluated molecular group-specific determinants of outcome and developed an improved risk stratification model. Methods: Patients aged 0-21 years with localized intracranial ependymoma were enrolled into the prospective clinical trial E-HIT2000. Treatment included maximum safe surgery, local radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, stratified according to age, histology and, following a major amendment, residual tumor. Clinical data were analyzed in a pooled molecularly annotated cohort with data from patients treated analogously within subsequent registries. Results: For 291 trial patients, the 5-year PFS and OS were 62±3% and 81±2%, respectively. For the molecularly annotated pooled cohort (n = 228), 5-year PFS/OS were: EPN-PFA (n = 146): 45±4%/77±4%; EPN-PFB (n = 19): 90±7%/100%; EPN-ZFTA (n = 59): 64±7%/86±5%; EPN-YAP1 (n = 4): 50±25%/100%. Patients with EPN-PFA without molecular risk factors (1q gain, and/or subtype EPN-PFA1c/d/e,2a), with complete resection, and postoperative radiotherapy showed favorable outcomes (5-year PFS/OS 75±10%/92±7%). For patients with EPN-PFA with molecular risk factors, prognosis was poor irrespective of residual tumor status (5-year PFS/OS: 33±6%/64±6%). Among EPN-ZFTA, 11/59 tumors were classified as EPN-ZFTA with alternative fusions, associated with inferior PFS (5-year PFS/OS: 36±15%/91±9%). For EPN-ZFTA-RELA, homozygous deletions of CDKN2A were associated with unfavorable outcomes (4-year PFS/OS: 19±16%/57±18% vs. 79±7%/97±3%, p = 0.0001). Finally, we developed a novel stratification model that discriminates standard and intermediate risk patients from those at high risk (p < 0.0001 for PFS and OS). Conclusions: These results strongly suggest the inclusion of molecular parameters into stratification, and the use of distinct treatment strategies within future ependymoma trials.
Authors
- Janna Wenning
- Andreas Beilken
- David R. Ghasemi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3844-9933)
- Denise Obrecht (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3216-8452)
- Jörg Felsberg
- Martin Mynarek (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3302-2719)
- Irene Schmid (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5105-3597)
- Björn O Juhnke
- et al.
- Roland Coras
- Ingmar Blümcke
- Elisabeth Rushing
- Norbert Graf
- Michael C Frühwald
- Pablo Hernáiz Driever
- Katja von Hoff
- Gudrun Fleischhack
- Nicolas U. Gerber
- Martin Benesch
- Brigitte Bison
- Markus Bergmann
- Beate Timmermann
- Kathy Keyvani
- Irene Slavc
- Andreas Faldum
- Guido Reifenberger
- Christian Hagel
- Arend Koch
- Stephan Tippelt
- Martin Ebinger
Publication Details
- Journal
- Universität Zürich, ZORA
- Published
- 2025-09-30
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-283521
- Primary Topic
- Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00