Sequence Labeling for Constituent Parsing: A Comparative Study and Encoding Innovations

Abstract Various encodings have been proposed to cast constituent parsing in terms of a sequence labeling task. However, unlike in the case of dependency parsing, existing comparisons have not been entirely homogeneous and, to the best of our knowledge, there is no systematic evaluation of these encodings under uniform configurations. A homogeneous evaluation needs to account for various aspects that could influence results, either by controlling for these aspects to ensure uniformity (e.g., network architecture, parameter settings, postprocessing of ill-formed output), or by systematically analyzing their impact (e.g., the impact of binary versus arbitrary structures). In this paper, we: (1) compare different encodings comprehensively both theoretically and empirically, on a modern neural architecture and across nine languages, and (2) also introduce new encodings and variants, including an encoding that our analysis finds particularly accurate and compact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computational Linguistics
Published
2026-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/coli.a.603
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sequence Labeling for Constituent Parsing: A Comparative Study and Encoding Innovations

Diego Roca, Carlos Gómez-Rodríguez
Computational Linguistics
Natural Language Processing Techniques
article

Sequence Labeling for Constituent Parsing: A Comparative Study and Encoding Innovations

Diego Roca, Carlos Gómez-Rodríguez
article en

Abstract

Abstract Various encodings have been proposed to cast constituent parsing in terms of a sequence labeling task. However, unlike in the case of dependency parsing, existing comparisons have not been entirely homogeneous and, to the best of our knowledge, there is no systematic evaluation of these encodings under uniform configurations. A homogeneous evaluation needs to account for various aspects that could influence results, either by controlling for these aspects to ensure uniformity (e.g., network architecture, parameter settings, postprocessing of ill-formed output), or by systematically analyzing their impact (e.g., the impact of binary versus arbitrary structures). In this paper, we: (1) compare different encodings comprehensively both theoretically and empirically, on a modern neural architecture and across nine languages, and (2) also introduce new encodings and variants, including an encoding that our analysis finds particularly accurate and compact.

Computational Linguistics
Universidade da Coruña (ES)
Xunta de Galicia, European Regional Development Fund, Agencia Estatal de Investigación, European Social Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.