Suture button versus syndesmotic screw fixation in acute ankle fractures with syndesmotic injury: An umbrella review of functional outcomes and clinical relevance based on the minimal clinically important difference

While SB fixation often demonstrates superior functional scores relative to SS fixation, these differences seldom exceed established MCID thresholds. The clinical relevance of these improvements therefore remains uncertain. As routine removal of syndesmotic screws is no longer advocated in the contemporary literature, and considering the findings of the present study, one could argue that the cost-effectiveness of using a suture-button in under scrutiny. Future studies should focus on refining MCID values for ankle-specific PROMs and improving methodological rigour in systematic reviews and meta-analyses to better determine whether SB fixation provides a meaningful advantage for patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Injury
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2026.113054
Primary Topic
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Suture button versus syndesmotic screw fixation in acute ankle fractures with syndesmotic injury: An umbrella review of functional outcomes and clinical relevance based on the minimal clinically important difference

Jasper Tausendfreund, Tim Schepers, Carmen L. Nieuwenkamp
Injury
Foot and Ankle Surgery
article

Suture button versus syndesmotic screw fixation in acute ankle fractures with syndesmotic injury: An umbrella review of functional outcomes and clinical relevance based on the minimal clinically important difference

Jasper Tausendfreund, Tim Schepers, Carmen L. Nieuwenkamp
article en

Abstract

While SB fixation often demonstrates superior functional scores relative to SS fixation, these differences seldom exceed established MCID thresholds. The clinical relevance of these improvements therefore remains uncertain. As routine removal of syndesmotic screws is no longer advocated in the contemporary literature, and considering the findings of the present study, one could argue that the cost-effectiveness of using a suture-button in under scrutiny. Future studies should focus on refining MCID values for ankle-specific PROMs and improving methodological rigour in systematic reviews and meta-analyses to better determine whether SB fixation provides a meaningful advantage for patients.

InjuryVol. 57(3)
Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Foot and Ankle Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Suture button versus syndesmotic screw fixation in acute ankle fractures with syndesmotic injury: An umbrella review of functional outcomes and clinical relevance based on the minimal clinically important difference — Jasper Tausendfreund, Tim Schepers, et al. · Injury (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS