Abstract A150: Prehospital Blood Pressure Lowering in Likely Intracerebral Hemorrhage Patients Is a Cost-Effective Treatment Strategy in Both US and China

Introduction: Prehospital blood pressure lowering in hyperacute stroke patients improves outcome in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) but worsens outcome in ischemic stroke (IS) patients, per the INTERACT 4 trial. Modeling has shown existing prehospital ICH recognition scales (e.g. CASPR) and point-of-care tests (e.g serum GFAP) have sufficient sensitivity/specificity in selecting a population strongly enriched for ICH to make field antihypertensive therapy in test-positive patients clinically beneficial. The objective of this study was to investigate if this treatment strategy would also be cost-effective. Methods: Modeling inputs were: 1) age- and sex-specific life expectancies from US and China actuarial tables; 2) mRS disability weights and disability-level specific mortality hazard ratios for ICH and IS; 3) 3m mRS outcomes for ICH and IS patients from INTERACT 4; and 4) costs of prehospital BP medication in the US (nifedipine) and China (urapidil). Aggregating these data, we calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for prehospital BP-lowering therapy over a range of positive predictive values (PPVs) for ICH of prehospital assessment tests from 50%-100%. Results: Table 1 shows ICER results for PPVs between 50%-100% for male and female US and Chinese patients. Treating patients test-positive for likely ICH was highly cost-effective in all scenarios. For example, at 80% PPV, prehospital BP-lowering cost $28 (dollars) per quality-adjusted life year gained in US male patients and ¥ 109 RMB (renminbi) per QALY in Chinese female patients. Fig 1.1 depicts model results in US male and female patients. In the prototypical male US patient age, DALYs with BP-lowering were 11.4 (YLL 9.6+YLD 1.8) vs without BP-lowering 11.7 (YLL 10.0+YLD 1.8). The average quality-adjusted life year gained for each treated male patient was 0.3y. Figure 1.2 depicts results in Chinese patients. In the prototypical Chinese female patient, DALYs with BP-lowering were 20.0 (YLL 16.9+YLD 3.1) vs without BP-lowering 20.7 (YLL 17.6+YLD 3.1). The average quality-adjusted life year gained for each treated female patient was 0.6y. Conclusion: Prehospital BP-lowering treatment in hyperacute stroke patients assessed as likely having ICH would be highly cost-effective at positive predictive values attainable by currently available ICH diagnostic scales and point-of-care tests. These findings support pivotal trial testing of this promising treatment approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stroke
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/str.57.suppl_1.a150
Primary Topic
Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract A150: Prehospital Blood Pressure Lowering in Likely Intracerebral Hemorrhage Patients Is a Cost-Effective Treatment Strategy in Both US and China

Sheng Zhang, Jeffrey Saver
Stroke
Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
article

Abstract A150: Prehospital Blood Pressure Lowering in Likely Intracerebral Hemorrhage Patients Is a Cost-Effective Treatment Strategy in Both US and China

Sheng Zhang, Jeffrey Saver
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Prehospital blood pressure lowering in hyperacute stroke patients improves outcome in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) but worsens outcome in ischemic stroke (IS) patients, per the INTERACT 4 trial. Modeling has shown existing prehospital ICH recognition scales (e.g. CASPR) and point-of-care tests (e.g serum GFAP) have sufficient sensitivity/specificity in selecting a population strongly enriched for ICH to make field antihypertensive therapy in test-positive patients clinically beneficial. The objective of this study was to investigate if this treatment strategy would also be cost-effective. Methods: Modeling inputs were: 1) age- and sex-specific life expectancies from US and China actuarial tables; 2) mRS disability weights and disability-level specific mortality hazard ratios for ICH and IS; 3) 3m mRS outcomes for ICH and IS patients from INTERACT 4; and 4) costs of prehospital BP medication in the US (nifedipine) and China (urapidil). Aggregating these data, we calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for prehospital BP-lowering therapy over a range of positive predictive values (PPVs) for ICH of prehospital assessment tests from 50%-100%. Results: Table 1 shows ICER results for PPVs between 50%-100% for male and female US and Chinese patients. Treating patients test-positive for likely ICH was highly cost-effective in all scenarios. For example, at 80% PPV, prehospital BP-lowering cost $28 (dollars) per quality-adjusted life year gained in US male patients and ¥ 109 RMB (renminbi) per QALY in Chinese female patients. Fig 1.1 depicts model results in US male and female patients. In the prototypical male US patient age, DALYs with BP-lowering were 11.4 (YLL 9.6+YLD 1.8) vs without BP-lowering 11.7 (YLL 10.0+YLD 1.8). The average quality-adjusted life year gained for each treated male patient was 0.3y. Figure 1.2 depicts results in Chinese patients. In the prototypical Chinese female patient, DALYs with BP-lowering were 20.0 (YLL 16.9+YLD 3.1) vs without BP-lowering 20.7 (YLL 17.6+YLD 3.1). The average quality-adjusted life year gained for each treated female patient was 0.6y. Conclusion: Prehospital BP-lowering treatment in hyperacute stroke patients assessed as likely having ICH would be highly cost-effective at positive predictive values attainable by currently available ICH diagnostic scales and point-of-care tests. These findings support pivotal trial testing of this promising treatment approach.

StrokeVol. 57(Suppl_1)
Electronic Sensor Technology (United States) (US), Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.