Towards automated identification of mass movements in spaceborne interferograms: Comparing expert mapping and deep learning approaches

Abstract. We compare the performance of domain experts and deep learning algorithms in mapping mass movements in alpine scenarios by relying on Sentinel-1 wrapped phase interferograms. First, statistical assessment suggest that same mass movements are not consistently delineated, with generally low intersection over union (IoU) values (0.21–0.41), reflecting the difficulty of consistently distinguishing between active/inactive and coherent/incoherent phase patterns. Second, we tested deep learning (DL) architectures and strategies trained on > 1000 manually mapped coherent phase patterns to identify the best-performing model. Among the tested DL models, U-Net++ with a ResNet-18 encoder and specific optimisations herein developed, achieved the highest performance. We found an IoU of 0.61 relative to the training labels and, when compared in the ten selected case-studies, DL fell within the range of inter-expert variability (mean IoU of 0.494 ± 0.045, Dice coefficient of 0.661 ± 0.041). Our results show that optimised DL approaches allow detecting mass-movement-related patterns in Sentinel-1 interferograms achieving performances in the same range or higher than domain-experts. DL can provide a substantial reduction in manual mapping efforts, consequently achieving higher levels of standardisation, homogeneity and reliability in the generation of mass movement catalogues based on radar interferograms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-375
Primary Topic
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards automated identification of mass movements in spaceborne interferograms: Comparing expert mapping and deep learning approaches

Jordan Aaron, Hugo Raetzo, Florian Denzinger, Gwendolyn Dasser et al.
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
article

Towards automated identification of mass movements in spaceborne interferograms: Comparing expert mapping and deep learning approaches

Jordan Aaron, Hugo Raetzo, Florian Denzinger, Gwendolyn Dasser, Michele Volpi, Andrea Manconi, Alessandro Maissen
article en

Abstract

Abstract. We compare the performance of domain experts and deep learning algorithms in mapping mass movements in alpine scenarios by relying on Sentinel-1 wrapped phase interferograms. First, statistical assessment suggest that same mass movements are not consistently delineated, with generally low intersection over union (IoU) values (0.21–0.41), reflecting the difficulty of consistently distinguishing between active/inactive and coherent/incoherent phase patterns. Second, we tested deep learning (DL) architectures and strategies trained on > 1000 manually mapped coherent phase patterns to identify the best-performing model. Among the tested DL models, U-Net++ with a ResNet-18 encoder and specific optimisations herein developed, achieved the highest performance. We found an IoU of 0.61 relative to the training labels and, when compared in the ten selected case-studies, DL fell within the range of inter-expert variability (mean IoU of 0.494 ± 0.045, Dice coefficient of 0.661 ± 0.041). Our results show that optimised DL approaches allow detecting mass-movement-related patterns in Sentinel-1 interferograms achieving performances in the same range or higher than domain-experts. DL can provide a substantial reduction in manual mapping efforts, consequently achieving higher levels of standardisation, homogeneity and reliability in the generation of mass movement catalogues based on radar interferograms.

Planetary Science Institute (US), ETH Zurich (CH), Swiss Data Science Center (CH), Federal Office for the Environment (CH), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.