Making the Invisible Visible: Theory and Treatment Specification in Occupational Therapy

In my final editorial as the Editor-in-Chief of the American Journal of Occupational Therapy, I reflect on the evolving role of theory in advancing treatment specification and interdisciplinary rehabilitation practice. Drawing on the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS) and recently published reporting guidelines, I distinguish between treatment theories, which explain how intervention ingredients are expected to change proximal targets, and enablement theories, which clarify how multiple targets collectively support distal participation outcomes. Using occupational therapy-specific and interdisciplinary examples, I illustrate how enablement theory complements treatment specification by connecting what occupational therapy practitioners do in intervention to what matters most to clients. While acknowledging the inherent complexity of rehabilitation interventions and the likelihood that early applications may be imperfect, I argue that progress requires deliberate use, reflection, and revision. Ultimately, this editorial invites occupational therapists to engage with theory as a practical tool for making intervention logic visible, communicable, and open to refinement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Occupational Therapy
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2026.051561
Primary Topic
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Making the Invisible Visible: Theory and Treatment Specification in Occupational Therapy

Stacey Reynolds
American Journal of Occupational Therapy
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
article

Making the Invisible Visible: Theory and Treatment Specification in Occupational Therapy

Stacey Reynolds
article en

Abstract

In my final editorial as the Editor-in-Chief of the American Journal of Occupational Therapy, I reflect on the evolving role of theory in advancing treatment specification and interdisciplinary rehabilitation practice. Drawing on the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS) and recently published reporting guidelines, I distinguish between treatment theories, which explain how intervention ingredients are expected to change proximal targets, and enablement theories, which clarify how multiple targets collectively support distal participation outcomes. Using occupational therapy-specific and interdisciplinary examples, I illustrate how enablement theory complements treatment specification by connecting what occupational therapy practitioners do in intervention to what matters most to clients. While acknowledging the inherent complexity of rehabilitation interventions and the likelihood that early applications may be imperfect, I argue that progress requires deliberate use, reflection, and revision. Ultimately, this editorial invites occupational therapists to engage with theory as a practical tool for making intervention logic visible, communicable, and open to refinement.

American Journal of Occupational TherapyVol. 80(2)
Virginia Commonwealth University (US), Reynolds Community College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.