Abstract TP203: Swallow Screen Failure Independently Predicts Length of Stay After Ischemic Stroke: Beyond Stroke Severity and Comorbidities

Background: Dysphagia is common after stroke and is associated with complications and prolonged hospitalization. While stroke severity and comorbidities contribute to length of stay (LOS), it is unclear whether a bedside swallow screen provides independent prognostic value. Objective: To determine whether failure of the Yale Swallow Screen (YSS) independently predicts LOS after ischemic stroke, beyond NIHSS and structured comorbidity burden. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 714 consecutive ischemic stroke admissions at a U.S. comprehensive stroke center from July 2024 to June 2025. Patients discharged against medical advice and those with baseline dysphagia were excluded. Dysphagia was defined as failure of the initial YSS. Thirty-one comorbidities were abstracted from structured EHR fields and grouped into domains (cardiometabolic, neuropsychiatric, pulmonary, malignancy, other). A comorbidity burden score was calculated as the number of domains present . Multivariable log-linear regression adjusted for age, sex, NIHSS, and comorbidity burden. Results: YSS was failed in 29.8% (213/714) of patients. Median LOS was 9.7 days in failures vs 4.7 days in passers. After adjustment, YSS failure remained strongly associated with longer LOS (+2.5 days; +34.9%, 95% CI 16.8–55.9, p <0.001). Among YSS-pass patients, comorbidity burden modestly increased LOS (+10.8% per domain, p =0.003). In contrast, comorbidity burden had no effect in YSS-failures (+3.7%, p =0.56). This indicates that once dysphagia is present, it outweighs the contribution of comorbidities to LOS . Conclusions: Failing the YSS was independently associated with longer hospitalization, even after adjusting for NIHSS and comorbidities. Comorbidity burden predicted LOS only in those who passed. These findings suggest that swallow screen results provide early prognostic information not fully captured by stroke severity or chronic health status. Future work should evaluate whether integrating dysphagia screen results into predictive models and early care-planning tools can not only streamline discharge efficiency but also reduce complications such as pneumonia, malnutrition, and deconditioning, ultimately improving long-term patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stroke
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/str.57.suppl_1.tp203
Primary Topic
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract TP203: Swallow Screen Failure Independently Predicts Length of Stay After Ischemic Stroke: Beyond Stroke Severity and Comorbidities

Dion Graybeal, Jennifer Rasmussen-Winkler, Martin A. Weiss, Mehr Hakim et al.
Stroke
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
article

Abstract TP203: Swallow Screen Failure Independently Predicts Length of Stay After Ischemic Stroke: Beyond Stroke Severity and Comorbidities

Dion Graybeal, Jennifer Rasmussen-Winkler, Martin A. Weiss, Mehr Hakim, Leigh Allen
article en

Abstract

Background: Dysphagia is common after stroke and is associated with complications and prolonged hospitalization. While stroke severity and comorbidities contribute to length of stay (LOS), it is unclear whether a bedside swallow screen provides independent prognostic value. Objective: To determine whether failure of the Yale Swallow Screen (YSS) independently predicts LOS after ischemic stroke, beyond NIHSS and structured comorbidity burden. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 714 consecutive ischemic stroke admissions at a U.S. comprehensive stroke center from July 2024 to June 2025. Patients discharged against medical advice and those with baseline dysphagia were excluded. Dysphagia was defined as failure of the initial YSS. Thirty-one comorbidities were abstracted from structured EHR fields and grouped into domains (cardiometabolic, neuropsychiatric, pulmonary, malignancy, other). A comorbidity burden score was calculated as the number of domains present . Multivariable log-linear regression adjusted for age, sex, NIHSS, and comorbidity burden. Results: YSS was failed in 29.8% (213/714) of patients. Median LOS was 9.7 days in failures vs 4.7 days in passers. After adjustment, YSS failure remained strongly associated with longer LOS (+2.5 days; +34.9%, 95% CI 16.8–55.9, p <0.001). Among YSS-pass patients, comorbidity burden modestly increased LOS (+10.8% per domain, p =0.003). In contrast, comorbidity burden had no effect in YSS-failures (+3.7%, p =0.56). This indicates that once dysphagia is present, it outweighs the contribution of comorbidities to LOS . Conclusions: Failing the YSS was independently associated with longer hospitalization, even after adjusting for NIHSS and comorbidities. Comorbidity burden predicted LOS only in those who passed. These findings suggest that swallow screen results provide early prognostic information not fully captured by stroke severity or chronic health status. Future work should evaluate whether integrating dysphagia screen results into predictive models and early care-planning tools can not only streamline discharge efficiency but also reduce complications such as pneumonia, malnutrition, and deconditioning, ultimately improving long-term patient outcomes.

StrokeVol. 57(Suppl_1)
Baylor University (US), Texas A&M University System (US), Baylor University Medical Center (US), Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Temple (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.