Optimizing Cattle, Yak, Camel, and Horse Meat Processing: Species‐Sex Physicochemical Drivers

This study assessed species and sex effects on nutritional and processing traits of meat from cattle (<i>Bos taurus</i>), yak (<i>Bos grunniens</i>), camel (<i>Camelus bactrianus</i>), and horse (<i>Equus caballus</i>). Nutrient characteristics exhibited significant interspecific differences but minimal sex-related variation. Notably, yak meat exhibited superior nutritional quality-higher protein (20.05%), lower fat (3.13%), richer essential (8.73 mg/g) and flavor (9.23 mg/g) amino acids, as well as elevated eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, 0.24%), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 0.48%), and monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs, 52.10%) (<i>p</i> < 0.05)-but required tenderization due to high shear force. In contrast, horse meat exhibited greater tenderness and a higher polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) content (9.35%) (<i>p</i> < 0.05), though its low water-holding capacity (WHC) and dark color present processing challenges. Unlike species effect dominating the nutritional and processing traits, sex mainly influenced processing characteristics, as evidenced by the more tender, richer marbled, and brighter meat from females (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Overall, nutritional profiles were primarily determined by species, with cattle and horse being similar and distinct from yak and camel. For processing, sex significantly influenced processing traits in yak, camel, and horse, but not in cattle. These findings support the development of tailored processing strategies to better utilize different red meat resources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Science & Nutrition
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.71394
Primary Topic
Animal Diversity and Health Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing Cattle, Yak, Camel, and Horse Meat Processing: Species‐Sex Physicochemical Drivers

Ang Ru, Long Xu, Xiaoling Yu, Yueyu Bai et al.
Food Science & Nutrition
Animal Diversity and Health Studies
article

Optimizing Cattle, Yak, Camel, and Horse Meat Processing: Species‐Sex Physicochemical Drivers

Ang Ru, Long Xu, Xiaoling Yu, Yueyu Bai, Xinghui Wang, Feng Yin, Chaozhi Zhu, Xueyuan Bai, Jing Li, Yilin Bai
article en

Abstract

This study assessed species and sex effects on nutritional and processing traits of meat from cattle (<i>Bos taurus</i>), yak (<i>Bos grunniens</i>), camel (<i>Camelus bactrianus</i>), and horse (<i>Equus caballus</i>). Nutrient characteristics exhibited significant interspecific differences but minimal sex-related variation. Notably, yak meat exhibited superior nutritional quality-higher protein (20.05%), lower fat (3.13%), richer essential (8.73 mg/g) and flavor (9.23 mg/g) amino acids, as well as elevated eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, 0.24%), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 0.48%), and monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs, 52.10%) (<i>p</i> < 0.05)-but required tenderization due to high shear force. In contrast, horse meat exhibited greater tenderness and a higher polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) content (9.35%) (<i>p</i> < 0.05), though its low water-holding capacity (WHC) and dark color present processing challenges. Unlike species effect dominating the nutritional and processing traits, sex mainly influenced processing characteristics, as evidenced by the more tender, richer marbled, and brighter meat from females (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Overall, nutritional profiles were primarily determined by species, with cattle and horse being similar and distinct from yak and camel. For processing, sex significantly influenced processing traits in yak, camel, and horse, but not in cattle. These findings support the development of tailored processing strategies to better utilize different red meat resources.

Food Science & NutritionVol. 14(2)
Zhengzhou University (CN), Zhumadian Central Hospital (CN), National Livestock Breeding Center (JP), Henan Agricultural University (CN)
National Key Research and Development Program of China
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Animal Diversity and Health Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.