Abstract WP147: County Level Geographic Variation in Stroke Hospitalization Rates Among Medicare Fee-For-Service Beneficiaries

Introduction: Granular regional stroke incidence data in the US is lacking. Thus, we sought to identify factors associated with county-level hospitalization rates and counties with hospitalization rates above or below expectation among Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries using publicly available data. Methods: Cross-sectional study based on the analysis of county-level three-year average ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke hospitalization rates (principal ICD-10 I63, I65-I66) per 100,000 population among Medicare FFS beneficiaries from 2018-2020 using publicly available data from the CDC’s Interactive Atlas of Heart Disease and Stroke (ATLAS) and other sources. Linear mixed models were fitted to investigate six sets of factors (n Total = 61) associated with county-level hospitalization rates in a serial additive stepwise fashion (i.e., demographics, overall population vascular risk factors, risk factor treatment, health delivery and access, environmental features, and socioeconomic status). We reported on the predicted hospitalization rates, fixed effects marginal R 2 , the most impactful factors using average marginal effects, and characterized proportional difference between observed and predicted hospitalization rates of the fully adjusted model. Results: The cohort of 3,198 counties and county-equivalents had a mean stroke hospitalization rate of 11.2 per 100,000 (SD= 2.6). Mean characteristics of included counties:19.4% above age 65y, 73% white, 7.6% coronary heart disease (CHD) prevalence, 38% hyperlipidemia prevalence, and 5.7 primary care physicians per 10,000. In the fully adjusted model, between-county unexplained variation was lower-than-expected but remained moderately high (Model 6 R 2 = 0.57) (Figure 1). The five most impactful factors included having a history of hypertension (a county at the 10th percentile of hypertension prevalence had a higher expected stroke hospitalization rate of 5.47 versus 7.90 at the 90th percentile), CHD, smoking, nonadherence to antihypertensive medication, and the elevation of the county above sea level (Table 1). Counties in the northwest and New England regions generally had lower-than-expected hospitalization rates (Figure 2). Conclusions: Considerable unexplained county-level variance in stroke hospitalization rates exists after accounting for a wide variety of known and potential predictors. Future work to explain unexplained variance may inform stroke mechanisms and interventions to improve systems of care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stroke
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/str.57.suppl_1.wp147
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract WP147: County Level Geographic Variation in Stroke Hospitalization Rates Among Medicare Fee-For-Service Beneficiaries

Kevin A. Kerber, Mohamed Ridha, James Burke, Jeffrey J. Wing et al.
Stroke
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract WP147: County Level Geographic Variation in Stroke Hospitalization Rates Among Medicare Fee-For-Service Beneficiaries

Kevin A. Kerber, Mohamed Ridha, James Burke, Jeffrey J. Wing, Chun Chieh Lin, Raed Hailat
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Granular regional stroke incidence data in the US is lacking. Thus, we sought to identify factors associated with county-level hospitalization rates and counties with hospitalization rates above or below expectation among Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries using publicly available data. Methods: Cross-sectional study based on the analysis of county-level three-year average ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke hospitalization rates (principal ICD-10 I63, I65-I66) per 100,000 population among Medicare FFS beneficiaries from 2018-2020 using publicly available data from the CDC’s Interactive Atlas of Heart Disease and Stroke (ATLAS) and other sources. Linear mixed models were fitted to investigate six sets of factors (n Total = 61) associated with county-level hospitalization rates in a serial additive stepwise fashion (i.e., demographics, overall population vascular risk factors, risk factor treatment, health delivery and access, environmental features, and socioeconomic status). We reported on the predicted hospitalization rates, fixed effects marginal R 2 , the most impactful factors using average marginal effects, and characterized proportional difference between observed and predicted hospitalization rates of the fully adjusted model. Results: The cohort of 3,198 counties and county-equivalents had a mean stroke hospitalization rate of 11.2 per 100,000 (SD= 2.6). Mean characteristics of included counties:19.4% above age 65y, 73% white, 7.6% coronary heart disease (CHD) prevalence, 38% hyperlipidemia prevalence, and 5.7 primary care physicians per 10,000. In the fully adjusted model, between-county unexplained variation was lower-than-expected but remained moderately high (Model 6 R 2 = 0.57) (Figure 1). The five most impactful factors included having a history of hypertension (a county at the 10th percentile of hypertension prevalence had a higher expected stroke hospitalization rate of 5.47 versus 7.90 at the 90th percentile), CHD, smoking, nonadherence to antihypertensive medication, and the elevation of the county above sea level (Table 1). Counties in the northwest and New England regions generally had lower-than-expected hospitalization rates (Figure 2). Conclusions: Considerable unexplained county-level variance in stroke hospitalization rates exists after accounting for a wide variety of known and potential predictors. Future work to explain unexplained variance may inform stroke mechanisms and interventions to improve systems of care.

StrokeVol. 57(Suppl_1)
The Ohio State University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.