Touching, Tinkering, and Manipulating: Bodily Engagement When Reading for Academic Purposes and Why It Matters

ABSTRACT Reading for academic purposes in higher education is a complex activity involving the use of various text types and formats, and readers interact with different objects such as laptops, tablets, paper formats, and writing tools. Such interactions entail embodied engagement: readers engage their bodies, especially their hands and fingers, to touch the reading surface, turn the page or scroll, tinker with a pen, and manipulate the texts. Yet, little attention has been given to the role of the reader's body during reading. This study suggests that bodily activities contribute to the ongoing reading processes, and the study asks: how do embodied, hands‐on engagement with objects—through touch, tinkering, and manipulation—shape real‐time, situated reading practices? We draw on data from a larger qualitative study to analyze embodied engagement during graduate students' naturalistic reading activities. Extensive video data is used to describe the readers' bodily enactment of ongoing reading processes, and we demonstrate and discuss how the interaction between reader and objects is shaped by the affordances in the physical objects. The analysis reveals how potential bodily activities vary because objects afford different ways of engaging with them. We conclude that graduate students' reading for academic purposes is an activity where the body plays a key role, and that embodied engagement with objects can both benefit and restrain students' reading. Integrating embodied and distributed perspectives on cognition with reading research can strengthen our understanding of naturalistic reading activities, and embodied engagement should be acknowledged as an important factor in reading.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reading Research Quarterly
Published
2026-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.70088
Primary Topic
Writing and Handwriting Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Touching, Tinkering, and Manipulating: Bodily Engagement When Reading for Academic Purposes and Why It Matters

Marte Pupe Støyva, Anne Mangen
Reading Research Quarterly
Writing and Handwriting Education
article

Touching, Tinkering, and Manipulating: Bodily Engagement When Reading for Academic Purposes and Why It Matters

Marte Pupe Støyva, Anne Mangen
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Reading for academic purposes in higher education is a complex activity involving the use of various text types and formats, and readers interact with different objects such as laptops, tablets, paper formats, and writing tools. Such interactions entail embodied engagement: readers engage their bodies, especially their hands and fingers, to touch the reading surface, turn the page or scroll, tinker with a pen, and manipulate the texts. Yet, little attention has been given to the role of the reader's body during reading. This study suggests that bodily activities contribute to the ongoing reading processes, and the study asks: how do embodied, hands‐on engagement with objects—through touch, tinkering, and manipulation—shape real‐time, situated reading practices? We draw on data from a larger qualitative study to analyze embodied engagement during graduate students' naturalistic reading activities. Extensive video data is used to describe the readers' bodily enactment of ongoing reading processes, and we demonstrate and discuss how the interaction between reader and objects is shaped by the affordances in the physical objects. The analysis reveals how potential bodily activities vary because objects afford different ways of engaging with them. We conclude that graduate students' reading for academic purposes is an activity where the body plays a key role, and that embodied engagement with objects can both benefit and restrain students' reading. Integrating embodied and distributed perspectives on cognition with reading research can strengthen our understanding of naturalistic reading activities, and embodied engagement should be acknowledged as an important factor in reading.

Reading Research QuarterlyVol. 61(2)
University of Stavanger (NO)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Writing and Handwriting Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.