Optimal cutoffs for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment among English and Spanish speaking Latinos

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is widely used to screen for cognitive impairment, yet commonly applied cutoff scores have been found to perform poorly among US Latinos. Prior studies relied on small samples, combining persons with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia into a single group, or failing to account for multiple intersecting demographic factors. We identified optimal MoCA cutoffs for MCI and dementia among US Latinos while addressing these limitations. We analyzed cross-sectional data from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Unified Data Set. Participants included English- and Spanish-speaking Latinos who completed testing in their primary language. Research diagnostic groups consisted of cognitively unimpaired (CU), MCI, and dementia. Groups were further stratified by testing language, age, and level of education. Diagnostic accuracy and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed. The Youden Index was used to determine the optimal cutoff score. Of the 1,673 participants in the total sample, 46% completed the MoCA in Spanish and 54% in English, 54% were CU, and 28% had MCI and 19% had dementia. Area under the curve (AUC) values for CU vs. MCI were 0.70 for Spanish-tested participants and 0.79 for English-tested participants, while values for MCI vs. dementia were 0.85 and 0.89 for the Spanish and English tested participants, respectively. Overall AUC values were 0.76 for CU vs. MCI and 0.86 for mild cognitive impairment vs. dementia. Optimal cutoffs were consistently found to be lower among participants tested in Spanish, those older than age 75, and participants with the fewest years of education, with some optimal cutoffs shown to be substantially lower than the traditionally used standard cutoff. These findings provide cutoffs that better reflect differences amongst language and demographic groups. We also provide a scoring calculator for clinical and research use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
medRxiv
Published
2026-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.26.26344881
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimal cutoffs for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment among English and Spanish speaking Latinos

K. Rascovsky, Adam C. Parks, Maria Marquine, Jaime Perales-Puchalt et al.
medRxiv
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Optimal cutoffs for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment among English and Spanish speaking Latinos

K. Rascovsky, Adam C. Parks, Maria Marquine, Jaime Perales-Puchalt, Andrew J Aschenbrenner
article en

Abstract

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is widely used to screen for cognitive impairment, yet commonly applied cutoff scores have been found to perform poorly among US Latinos. Prior studies relied on small samples, combining persons with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia into a single group, or failing to account for multiple intersecting demographic factors. We identified optimal MoCA cutoffs for MCI and dementia among US Latinos while addressing these limitations. We analyzed cross-sectional data from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Unified Data Set. Participants included English- and Spanish-speaking Latinos who completed testing in their primary language. Research diagnostic groups consisted of cognitively unimpaired (CU), MCI, and dementia. Groups were further stratified by testing language, age, and level of education. Diagnostic accuracy and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed. The Youden Index was used to determine the optimal cutoff score. Of the 1,673 participants in the total sample, 46% completed the MoCA in Spanish and 54% in English, 54% were CU, and 28% had MCI and 19% had dementia. Area under the curve (AUC) values for CU vs. MCI were 0.70 for Spanish-tested participants and 0.79 for English-tested participants, while values for MCI vs. dementia were 0.85 and 0.89 for the Spanish and English tested participants, respectively. Overall AUC values were 0.76 for CU vs. MCI and 0.86 for mild cognitive impairment vs. dementia. Optimal cutoffs were consistently found to be lower among participants tested in Spanish, those older than age 75, and participants with the fewest years of education, with some optimal cutoffs shown to be substantially lower than the traditionally used standard cutoff. These findings provide cutoffs that better reflect differences amongst language and demographic groups. We also provide a scoring calculator for clinical and research use.

medRxiv
Duke University (US), University of Kansas Medical Center (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.