No egalitarianism in the Wa hills: relative commensuration in kinship, sacrifice, and war

The autonomy of the United Wa State Army of Myanmar today is said to be based on the egalitarianism of Wa communities in the past. The analysis of commensuration in kinship, sacrifice, and war challenges these portrayals of autonomy and egalitarianism. In the past, the making and taking of lives could not be measured in absolute terms but required situationally specific and relational commensuration. Since the 1960s, commensuration has intensified with modern technologies and communication networks, especially in the context of military government, enabling new scales and benchmarks for measuring social relations. Military organization and cultural authenticity are based on absolute measures and exact equivalences, at least in theory. In practice, the levelling of human lives is resisted in the social relations of para‐militarism, and in the cultural production of para‐nationalism. Assessing the scale and violence of measurement, the article describes how relations of autonomy and mutuality changed from sacrificial exchange in the past to para‐nationalist sacrifice today, without ever becoming ‘egalitarian’ in the strict sense of the term.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.70065
Primary Topic
Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No egalitarianism in the Wa hills: relative commensuration in kinship, sacrifice, and war

Hans Steinmüller
Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography
article

No egalitarianism in the Wa hills: relative commensuration in kinship, sacrifice, and war

Hans Steinmüller
article en

Abstract

The autonomy of the United Wa State Army of Myanmar today is said to be based on the egalitarianism of Wa communities in the past. The analysis of commensuration in kinship, sacrifice, and war challenges these portrayals of autonomy and egalitarianism. In the past, the making and taking of lives could not be measured in absolute terms but required situationally specific and relational commensuration. Since the 1960s, commensuration has intensified with modern technologies and communication networks, especially in the context of military government, enabling new scales and benchmarks for measuring social relations. Military organization and cultural authenticity are based on absolute measures and exact equivalences, at least in theory. In practice, the levelling of human lives is resisted in the social relations of para‐militarism, and in the cultural production of para‐nationalism. Assessing the scale and violence of measurement, the article describes how relations of autonomy and mutuality changed from sacrificial exchange in the past to para‐nationalist sacrifice today, without ever becoming ‘egalitarian’ in the strict sense of the term.

Journal of the Royal Anthropological InstituteVol. 32(S1)
London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Yunnan University
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

No egalitarianism in the Wa hills: relative commensuration in kinship, sacrifice, and war — Hans Steinmüller · Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS