Real-world performance of the AI diagnostic system IDx-DR in the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy and its main confounders

The escalating prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) emphasizes the critical need for early detection of diabetic retinopathy (DR). This study assesses the performance of the autonomous AI-based diagnostic system IDx-DR in detecting DR and its associated confounders in a real-world clinical setting. This prospective cross-sectional study involved 875 diabetic patients with a mean age of 52 years (range: 8-92). Retinal images were captured by trained assistants. IDx-DR results were compared with mydriatic fundus examination (gold standard) and Ophthalmologists' image analysis. Factors impacting image acquisition or analyzability were examined. Among all patients, 10.5% yielded no image in miosis, and 26.1% were unanalyzable by IDx-DR. Confounders affecting image acquisition were examiner, pupil size, patient age and patients' visual acuity. When good quality images were achieved, IDx-DR performed well, particularly in detection of severe DR (sensitivity 94.4%; specificity 90.5%). IDx-DR results exactly matched Ophthalmologists' mydriatic fundoscopy gradings in 54.2% if images of sufficient quality were obtainable. Undergrading of DR severity by IDx-DR was rare (4.8%). IDx-DR shows promise in detecting DR, especially in resource-limited settings and in detecting severe DR. One remaining challenge is good image acquisition in miotic patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36970-9
Primary Topic
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world performance of the AI diagnostic system IDx-DR in the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy and its main confounders

Beathe Bohl, W. Kerner, Broder Poschkamp, Tara Brauckmann et al.
Scientific Reports
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
article

Real-world performance of the AI diagnostic system IDx-DR in the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy and its main confounders

Beathe Bohl, W. Kerner, Broder Poschkamp, Tara Brauckmann, Martin Busch, Allam Tayar, Elisabeth Hunfeld, Merlin Dähmcke, Johanna M. Pfeil, Sonja Eilts, P Augstein, Frank Tost, Bastian Grundel, Jana Kühn, Andreas Stahl, Milena Grundel, Eva Morawiec-Kisiel, Sebastian Paul, Jörg Reindel, Rico Großjohann, Marie-Christine Bründer
article en

Abstract

The escalating prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) emphasizes the critical need for early detection of diabetic retinopathy (DR). This study assesses the performance of the autonomous AI-based diagnostic system IDx-DR in detecting DR and its associated confounders in a real-world clinical setting. This prospective cross-sectional study involved 875 diabetic patients with a mean age of 52 years (range: 8-92). Retinal images were captured by trained assistants. IDx-DR results were compared with mydriatic fundus examination (gold standard) and Ophthalmologists' image analysis. Factors impacting image acquisition or analyzability were examined. Among all patients, 10.5% yielded no image in miosis, and 26.1% were unanalyzable by IDx-DR. Confounders affecting image acquisition were examiner, pupil size, patient age and patients' visual acuity. When good quality images were achieved, IDx-DR performed well, particularly in detection of severe DR (sensitivity 94.4%; specificity 90.5%). IDx-DR results exactly matched Ophthalmologists' mydriatic fundoscopy gradings in 54.2% if images of sufficient quality were obtainable. Undergrading of DR severity by IDx-DR was rare (4.8%). IDx-DR shows promise in detecting DR, especially in resource-limited settings and in detecting severe DR. One remaining challenge is good image acquisition in miotic patients.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (DE), Institute for Diabetes Gerhardt Katsch (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.