Multidisciplinary Co-Design Optimization and Reinforcement Learning for CubeSat Architecting

Preliminary design stage of aerospace system presents a challenge to rapidly evaluate architectural selections with acceptable accuracy. Several actors involve at this stage, such as mission owner, mission designer, and technology provider. The cooperation among these actors promote co-design activities. Co-design means parts of the design are performed by "ideal" sizing models (physics- and mission-based), while the other parts leverage the flight heritage or commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) components. However, there is barely research exploring co-design concept in both component and analysis levels using Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO) technique. Therefore, we propose a framework to formulate multidisciplinary co-design optimization in these levels for CubeSat architecting. The framework is capable to quantify the impacts of integrating COTS components into an "ideally-designed" CubeSat. The results show that some COTS perform comparably as high as the ideal design, while the others do not. The performance properties (e.g. power architecture score and CubeSat mass) provide some insights to actors to decide which components are suitable to be on-board. Based on those properties, the importance of each architectural decision-making is deducted quantitatively. Then, we implement reinforcement learning (RL) into the framework to explore the design space and find the optimum CubeSat architectures. The results show that RL is advantageous compared to enumerative approach for larger number of CubeSat architectures. Both mission designer and technology provider can leverage the framework to reduce the duration of architectural decision-making during preliminary design stage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2026-1609
Primary Topic
Spacecraft Design and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multidisciplinary Co-Design Optimization and Reinforcement Learning for CubeSat Architecting

Jasper Bussemaker, Sami Lazreg, Marco Wijaya, Maxime Cordy et al.
Spacecraft Design and Technology
article

Multidisciplinary Co-Design Optimization and Reinforcement Learning for CubeSat Architecting

Jasper Bussemaker, Sami Lazreg, Marco Wijaya, Maxime Cordy, Andreas Hein
article en

Abstract

Preliminary design stage of aerospace system presents a challenge to rapidly evaluate architectural selections with acceptable accuracy. Several actors involve at this stage, such as mission owner, mission designer, and technology provider. The cooperation among these actors promote co-design activities. Co-design means parts of the design are performed by "ideal" sizing models (physics- and mission-based), while the other parts leverage the flight heritage or commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) components. However, there is barely research exploring co-design concept in both component and analysis levels using Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO) technique. Therefore, we propose a framework to formulate multidisciplinary co-design optimization in these levels for CubeSat architecting. The framework is capable to quantify the impacts of integrating COTS components into an "ideally-designed" CubeSat. The results show that some COTS perform comparably as high as the ideal design, while the others do not. The performance properties (e.g. power architecture score and CubeSat mass) provide some insights to actors to decide which components are suitable to be on-board. Based on those properties, the importance of each architectural decision-making is deducted quantitatively. Then, we implement reinforcement learning (RL) into the framework to explore the design space and find the optimum CubeSat architectures. The results show that RL is advantageous compared to enumerative approach for larger number of CubeSat architectures. Both mission designer and technology provider can leverage the framework to reduce the duration of architectural decision-making during preliminary design stage.

Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Spacecraft Design and Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.