Optimising Mental Health Care for People With Neurological Conditions in the UK: Evidence-Based Models for Integrated Neuropsychiatric Services

Neuropsychiatry bridges neurology and psychiatry by addressing mental health symptoms arising from brain disorders. Psychiatric comorbidities are common in neurological conditions, yet access to appropriate mental health care in the UK remains fragmented. This review evaluates the evidence for current UK neuropsychiatric service models and explores strategies to improve integration and access. A targeted narrative review of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Embase (2000-2025) examined studies evaluating neuropsychiatric service models, including outcomes such as access, cost-effectiveness, patient outcomes, and clinician perspectives. Citation tracking was used to identify seminal models, including Sharpe's integrated approach. While liaison psychiatry services are present in over 90% of UK hospitals with emergency departments, many fall short of recommended staffing and capacity. Specialist inpatient neuropsychiatry units improve outcomes through multidisciplinary care but are geographically limited. Integrated neuropsychiatry services, such as the Oxford model, show the greatest clinical and economic promise by embedding psychiatry within neuroscience teams, though scalability is constrained by workforce shortages, fragmented commissioning, and inconsistent evaluation. Integrated care offers the most effective means of addressing neuropsychiatric need. Achieving equitable access will require workforce expansion, cross-specialty training, unified funding mechanisms, and robust evaluation to ensure consistent, evidence-based care across the UK.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.102546
Primary Topic
Mental Health Treatment and Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimising Mental Health Care for People With Neurological Conditions in the UK: Evidence-Based Models for Integrated Neuropsychiatric Services

Naireen Asim, Atiqa Miah
Cureus
Mental Health Treatment and Access
article

Optimising Mental Health Care for People With Neurological Conditions in the UK: Evidence-Based Models for Integrated Neuropsychiatric Services

Naireen Asim, Atiqa Miah
article en

Abstract

Neuropsychiatry bridges neurology and psychiatry by addressing mental health symptoms arising from brain disorders. Psychiatric comorbidities are common in neurological conditions, yet access to appropriate mental health care in the UK remains fragmented. This review evaluates the evidence for current UK neuropsychiatric service models and explores strategies to improve integration and access. A targeted narrative review of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Embase (2000-2025) examined studies evaluating neuropsychiatric service models, including outcomes such as access, cost-effectiveness, patient outcomes, and clinician perspectives. Citation tracking was used to identify seminal models, including Sharpe's integrated approach. While liaison psychiatry services are present in over 90% of UK hospitals with emergency departments, many fall short of recommended staffing and capacity. Specialist inpatient neuropsychiatry units improve outcomes through multidisciplinary care but are geographically limited. Integrated neuropsychiatry services, such as the Oxford model, show the greatest clinical and economic promise by embedding psychiatry within neuroscience teams, though scalability is constrained by workforce shortages, fragmented commissioning, and inconsistent evaluation. Integrated care offers the most effective means of addressing neuropsychiatric need. Achieving equitable access will require workforce expansion, cross-specialty training, unified funding mechanisms, and robust evaluation to ensure consistent, evidence-based care across the UK.

CureusVol. 18(1)
Barts Health NHS Trust (GB), Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust (GB)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Mental Health Treatment and Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.