Abstract DP076: Thrombectomy vs Thrombolysis vs Bridging Therapy in Late-Window Stroke with Salvageable Tissue: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background: For patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke in the late therapeutic window (>4.5 hours), the optimal treatment strategy remains debated. We conducted a network meta-analysis comparing endovascular thrombectomy, thrombolysis with alteplase or tenecteplase, and best medical therapy in patients with salvageable tissue, focusing on both efficacy and safety outcomes. Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library through July 2025, identifying RCTs enrolling adults with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion in the late window based on CT/MR perfusion imaging. A random-effects network meta-analysis compared EVT, alteplase, tenecteplase, and best medical therapy. Primary outcome was functional independence; secondary outcomes included severe disability/death, mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Results: Fifteen trials enrolling 4,497 patients were included. Time-to-treatment across studies was 10.05 ± 4.78 hours. EVT was associated with significantly reduced 90-day mortality compared to alteplase (OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.19–0.89) and better functional outcomes (mRS 0–2 OR 2.12; 95% CI 0.75–5.98). EVT also reduced the odds of mRS 5–6 (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.18–1.00) and showed a numerically favorable safety profile over alteplase in sICH risk (OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.08–1.91). Compared with tenecteplase, EVT lowered mortality (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.38–0.98) with comparable efficacy. Tenecteplase had a lower sICH risk than alteplase (OR 0.27; 95% CI 0.05–1.57). Rankograms showed EVT consistently ranked highest for efficacy and safety. Conclusion: In patients with salvageable tissue presenting in the late window, EVT provides superior efficacy and safety compared to thrombolysis or medical therapy alone. Tenecteplase may offer safety advantages over alteplase. These findings support prioritizing EVT access and rapid imaging in late-presenting stroke.
Authors
- Wei Jun Lee (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5611-2130)
- Sang-woong Lee
- Chau Dang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4136-4997)
- Tuan Vinh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6808-3736)
- Hong-Han Huynh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0083-4913)
- Duc-Huy T. Nguyen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0805-8103)
- Uyen Dang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0954-7540)
- Tam Tran
- U. Do
- Nghia Nguyen
- Huyen Le
- Hoai Huu Le
- Hung Phan Huu
- Khoa Tran
- Lam Chau
- Minh Le
- Kaisi Xing
- Linh Nguyen
- Thu Huynh Minh Le
Institutions
- Emory University (US)
- Can Tho University (VN)
- Harvard University Press (US)
- Taipei Medical University Hospital (TW)
- San Joaquin General Hospital (US)
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City (VN)
- St. Elizabeth's Medical Center (US)
- Methodist Hospital (US)
- California Northstate University (US)
- Merrill (United States) (US)
- Taipei Medical University (TW)
- University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
- Atlanta University Center (US)
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
- University of Atlanta (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Stroke
- Published
- 2026-01-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1161/str.57.suppl_1.dp076
- Primary Topic
- Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00