Structural Response and Damage of RPC Bridge Piers Under Heavy Vehicle Impact: A High-Fidelity FE Study

With the continuous growth of highway traffic volume and the increasing proportion of heavy vehicles, vehicle–bridge collisions have emerged as a significant accidental hazard threatening the safe operation of bridge infrastructure. Systematic investigation of the collision resistance of critical bridge components is therefore essential for the development of rational anti-collision design strategies and reliable risk assessment methods. Focusing on the representative disaster scenario of high-speed heavy vehicles impacting concrete bridge piers, this study first develops a finite element model of an RPC beam and validates its reliability through impact experiments. The validated modeling approach is then extended to bridge piers, where a high-fidelity finite element model established using ANSYS/LS-DYNA 2020 is employed to simulate the vehicle–pier collision process and to systematically investigate collision force characteristics, bridge damage evolution, and collision response behavior. The results show that the established reactive powder concrete (RPC) beam model, validated through drop hammer impact tests, reliably captures the impact-induced damage and dynamic response of concrete members. During heavy-vehicle impacts, the vehicle head and cargo compartment successively interact with the pier, generating two distinct collision force peaks, with the peak force induced by the cargo compartment being approximately 38.2% higher than that caused by the vehicle head. Severe damage is mainly concentrated within the impact region, characterized by punching shear failure on the impact face, tensile damage on the rear face, and shear failure near the pier top. The collision-induced structural response is dominated by horizontal displacement, which remains below 10 mm during the vehicle head impact but exceeds 260 mm under the cargo compartment impact. Significant displacements are also observed in the cap beam, with maximum horizontal and vertical values of 24 mm and 19 mm, respectively. These findings provide valuable insights into the impact behavior and failure mechanisms of concrete bridge piers, offering a sound theoretical basis and technical support for anti-vehicle collision design, collision-resistant structural optimization, bridge damage assessment, and the refinement of relevant design specifications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16030549
Primary Topic
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structural Response and Damage of RPC Bridge Piers Under Heavy Vehicle Impact: A High-Fidelity FE Study

Buren Yang, Tengteng Zheng, Caiqi Zhao, Jinjun Zhu et al.
Buildings
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
article

Structural Response and Damage of RPC Bridge Piers Under Heavy Vehicle Impact: A High-Fidelity FE Study

Buren Yang, Tengteng Zheng, Caiqi Zhao, Jinjun Zhu, Hui Wang, Yanqiong Geng
article en

Abstract

With the continuous growth of highway traffic volume and the increasing proportion of heavy vehicles, vehicle–bridge collisions have emerged as a significant accidental hazard threatening the safe operation of bridge infrastructure. Systematic investigation of the collision resistance of critical bridge components is therefore essential for the development of rational anti-collision design strategies and reliable risk assessment methods. Focusing on the representative disaster scenario of high-speed heavy vehicles impacting concrete bridge piers, this study first develops a finite element model of an RPC beam and validates its reliability through impact experiments. The validated modeling approach is then extended to bridge piers, where a high-fidelity finite element model established using ANSYS/LS-DYNA 2020 is employed to simulate the vehicle–pier collision process and to systematically investigate collision force characteristics, bridge damage evolution, and collision response behavior. The results show that the established reactive powder concrete (RPC) beam model, validated through drop hammer impact tests, reliably captures the impact-induced damage and dynamic response of concrete members. During heavy-vehicle impacts, the vehicle head and cargo compartment successively interact with the pier, generating two distinct collision force peaks, with the peak force induced by the cargo compartment being approximately 38.2% higher than that caused by the vehicle head. Severe damage is mainly concentrated within the impact region, characterized by punching shear failure on the impact face, tensile damage on the rear face, and shear failure near the pier top. The collision-induced structural response is dominated by horizontal displacement, which remains below 10 mm during the vehicle head impact but exceeds 260 mm under the cargo compartment impact. Significant displacements are also observed in the cap beam, with maximum horizontal and vertical values of 24 mm and 19 mm, respectively. These findings provide valuable insights into the impact behavior and failure mechanisms of concrete bridge piers, offering a sound theoretical basis and technical support for anti-vehicle collision design, collision-resistant structural optimization, bridge damage assessment, and the refinement of relevant design specifications.

BuildingsVol. 16(3)
Shanghai Liangyou (China) (CN), Southeast University (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.