Accuracy of DentalMonitoring’s artificial intelligence in detecting common orthodontic braces treatment related emergencies

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of DentalMonitoring™ (DM) (Dental Monitoring SAS, Paris, France), an FDA-cleared AI-powered orthodontic remote monitoring software, in detecting three common orthodontic appliance issues: bracket debonding, open self-ligating clips, and tie loss. Datasets from 1,014 US-based patients were analyzed. Each DM image set was assessed by the AI algorithm and independently reviewed by a panel of three orthodontic experts, whose consensus served as the reference standard. A total of 659 evaluations were included for bracket debonding, 647 for self-ligating clip status, and 653 for tie presence. Sensitivity and specificity along with their 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a two-level evaluation basis (positive vs. negative) across the three clinical parameters. DM's AI demonstrated high diagnostic performance, with sensitivity of 98.4% for bracket debonding, 91.1% for open self-ligating clips, and 93.3% for tie loss. Corresponding specificity values were 99.6%, 88.3%, and 96.5%, respectively. Current results indicate that DM's AI analysis system has high accuracy in detecting bracket debonding, open self-ligating clips, and tie loss. DM can help significantly reduce the rate of these undetected clinical incidents, providing a better approach to managing emergencies and maintaining clinical control in orthodontic treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37329-w
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy of DentalMonitoring’s artificial intelligence in detecting common orthodontic braces treatment related emergencies

William Dabney, Julie McCray, Mohammed H. Elnagar, Dylan Handlin et al.
Scientific Reports
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Accuracy of DentalMonitoring’s artificial intelligence in detecting common orthodontic braces treatment related emergencies

William Dabney, Julie McCray, Mohammed H. Elnagar, Dylan Handlin, Logan Smith, Rayan Skafi, Courtney Mietz
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of DentalMonitoring™ (DM) (Dental Monitoring SAS, Paris, France), an FDA-cleared AI-powered orthodontic remote monitoring software, in detecting three common orthodontic appliance issues: bracket debonding, open self-ligating clips, and tie loss. Datasets from 1,014 US-based patients were analyzed. Each DM image set was assessed by the AI algorithm and independently reviewed by a panel of three orthodontic experts, whose consensus served as the reference standard. A total of 659 evaluations were included for bracket debonding, 647 for self-ligating clip status, and 653 for tie presence. Sensitivity and specificity along with their 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a two-level evaluation basis (positive vs. negative) across the three clinical parameters. DM's AI demonstrated high diagnostic performance, with sensitivity of 98.4% for bracket debonding, 91.1% for open self-ligating clips, and 93.3% for tie loss. Corresponding specificity values were 99.6%, 88.3%, and 96.5%, respectively. Current results indicate that DM's AI analysis system has high accuracy in detecting bracket debonding, open self-ligating clips, and tie loss. DM can help significantly reduce the rate of these undetected clinical incidents, providing a better approach to managing emergencies and maintaining clinical control in orthodontic treatment.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Tanta University (EG), University of Dental Medicine (MM), University of Illinois Chicago (US), Hill Engineering (United States) (US), Saint Louis University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Accuracy of DentalMonitoring’s artificial intelligence in detecting common orthodontic braces treatment related emergencies — William Dabney, Julie McCray, et al. · Scientific Reports (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS