Uncovering relations between self-reported TPACK and objective measures: accounting for experience

The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework (TPACK) is a widely adopted framework for describing teachers’ knowledge in the digital era. A great part of TPACK research relies on self-report, for which convergent validity with objective measures is mostly lacking. Yet triangulation studies have not considered how one’s experience may influence their knowledge self-assessment accuracy. This study attempts to account for experience in investigating the relations between self-reported TPACK and objective measures derived from lesson plan designs. Based on a sample of 337 preservice upper secondary teachers, we conducted two cluster analyses, one based on self-reported TPACK alone and one based on self-reported TPACK and years of experience. Thereafter, we used a subsample to investigate the relations between these groups and objective measures in their lesson plan, namely their learning objectives, based on Bloom’s revised taxonomy, and their planned activities, coded along ICAP. Finally, we used epistemic network analysis to visualize structural differences between groups. Findings indicated that in contrast to groups derived from TPACK alone, accounting for experience revealed patterns of positive relations between TPACK, experience, levels of cognitive abilities, and levels of intended engagement. These results suggest that accounting for experience in self-reported TPACK may offer a lens to bring relations with objective measures of lesson plans to the surface.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-283203
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncovering relations between self-reported TPACK and objective measures: accounting for experience

Mirjam Schmid, Dominik Petko, Jo Tondeur, Eliana Maria Brianza
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
article

Uncovering relations between self-reported TPACK and objective measures: accounting for experience

Mirjam Schmid, Dominik Petko, Jo Tondeur, Eliana Maria Brianza
article en

Abstract

The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework (TPACK) is a widely adopted framework for describing teachers’ knowledge in the digital era. A great part of TPACK research relies on self-report, for which convergent validity with objective measures is mostly lacking. Yet triangulation studies have not considered how one’s experience may influence their knowledge self-assessment accuracy. This study attempts to account for experience in investigating the relations between self-reported TPACK and objective measures derived from lesson plan designs. Based on a sample of 337 preservice upper secondary teachers, we conducted two cluster analyses, one based on self-reported TPACK alone and one based on self-reported TPACK and years of experience. Thereafter, we used a subsample to investigate the relations between these groups and objective measures in their lesson plan, namely their learning objectives, based on Bloom’s revised taxonomy, and their planned activities, coded along ICAP. Finally, we used epistemic network analysis to visualize structural differences between groups. Findings indicated that in contrast to groups derived from TPACK alone, accounting for experience revealed patterns of positive relations between TPACK, experience, levels of cognitive abilities, and levels of intended engagement. These results suggest that accounting for experience in self-reported TPACK may offer a lens to bring relations with objective measures of lesson plans to the surface.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.