Deliverable 2.2 - A toolkit supporting the participatory natural capital valuation framework

In this report we build on the classification of values proposed by the Intergovernmental Science Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) and suggest a combination of methods and tools for discussing a plurality of values to support local decision making. We initially provide considerations on typologies of values and why we need a variety of different approaches to reach value pluralism. We then describe some methods and tools that can be adopted by land users, community groups and natural capital partnerships to support decision making. These tools can be also used by researchers who want to acquire knowledge on the duality and relationships between economic and social values. To achieve this goal, we have designed several steps that support discussions on the conditions of natural capital assets and contextualise values under different scenarios through the analysis of the interactions between nature and humans. The tool was tested at Glensaugh, the climate-positive farm owned and managed by the James Hutton Institute.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18410803
Primary Topic
Environmental Conservation and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deliverable 2.2 - A toolkit supporting the participatory natural capital valuation framework

Katy Joyce, Amanda Nyström, Maria Nijnik, Simone Martino et al.
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Environmental Conservation and Management
article

Deliverable 2.2 - A toolkit supporting the participatory natural capital valuation framework

Katy Joyce, Amanda Nyström, Maria Nijnik, Simone Martino, Margaret McKeen, Sam Poskitt, Chen Wang, Emma Coffey
article en

Abstract

In this report we build on the classification of values proposed by the Intergovernmental Science Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) and suggest a combination of methods and tools for discussing a plurality of values to support local decision making. We initially provide considerations on typologies of values and why we need a variety of different approaches to reach value pluralism. We then describe some methods and tools that can be adopted by land users, community groups and natural capital partnerships to support decision making. These tools can be also used by researchers who want to acquire knowledge on the duality and relationships between economic and social values. To achieve this goal, we have designed several steps that support discussions on the conditions of natural capital assets and contextualise values under different scenarios through the analysis of the interactions between nature and humans. The tool was tested at Glensaugh, the climate-positive farm owned and managed by the James Hutton Institute.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
James Hutton Institute (GB), University of Reading (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Environmental Conservation and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Deliverable 2.2 - A toolkit supporting the participatory natural capital valuation framework — Katy Joyce, Amanda Nyström, et al. · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS