Investigating the two-by-two relationships between situational awareness, eye movements and performance in forklift drivers

In order to effectively measure the situational awareness (SA) and performance of forklift drivers, this study delves into the two-by-two relationships among SA, eye movements and performance based on field experiment data. A field experiment was conducted involving 15 forklift drivers who completed three tasks with varying loads. The 3D situation awareness rating technique (SART) questionnaire was developed to calculate each driver's SA score, expert performance ratings were used to assess driver performance, and eye tracking technology was employed to collect real-time eye movement data. Pearson's correlation coefficient was utilized to explore the correlations among these variables. The findings revealed significant correlations between numerous eye-tracking indicators and SA across different subtasks. In certain tasks, some eye-tracking indicators were found to exhibit a significant correlation with performance. Interestingly, no direct correlation between SA and performance was observed. These findings can provide important insights for the assessment of SA and performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2026.2617003
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the two-by-two relationships between situational awareness, eye movements and performance in forklift drivers

Wei Huang, Yutao Kang, Jianjun Wu, Xuan Gao et al.
International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Investigating the two-by-two relationships between situational awareness, eye movements and performance in forklift drivers

Wei Huang, Yutao Kang, Jianjun Wu, Xuan Gao, Xinwen Sheng, Xiaolin Zhu
article en

Abstract

In order to effectively measure the situational awareness (SA) and performance of forklift drivers, this study delves into the two-by-two relationships among SA, eye movements and performance based on field experiment data. A field experiment was conducted involving 15 forklift drivers who completed three tasks with varying loads. The 3D situation awareness rating technique (SART) questionnaire was developed to calculate each driver's SA score, expert performance ratings were used to assess driver performance, and eye tracking technology was employed to collect real-time eye movement data. Pearson's correlation coefficient was utilized to explore the correlations among these variables. The findings revealed significant correlations between numerous eye-tracking indicators and SA across different subtasks. In certain tasks, some eye-tracking indicators were found to exhibit a significant correlation with performance. Interestingly, no direct correlation between SA and performance was observed. These findings can provide important insights for the assessment of SA and performance.

International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics
China State Shipbuilding (China) (CN), Shanghai Maritime University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Investigating the two-by-two relationships between situational awareness, eye movements and performance in forklift drivers — Wei Huang, Yutao Kang, et al. · International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS