Core Outcome Sets for Meningioma In Clinical studies (COSMIC): An international patient and healthcare professional consensus for research studies
Background: Core Outcome Sets (COS) define the minimum outcomes that should be measured and reported in all clinical trials for a specific health condition or health area. The aim was to develop 2 COS for intracranial meningioma to be used in future clinical studies: COSMIC: Intervention for effectiveness trials and COSMIC: Observation for studies of incidental/untreated meningioma. Methods: A study advisory group was formed with representation from international stakeholder groups: EORTC BTG, ICOM, EANO, SNO, RANO-PRO, BNOS, SBNS, BIMS, TBTC, International Brain Tumour Alliance, and Brainstrust. Outcomes of potential relevance to key stakeholders were identified and rationalized to populate 2 eDelphi surveys. Participants were recruited internationally and asked to rate each outcome on its importance for inclusion in the COS. The 2 final COS were ratified through 2, one-day, online consensus meetings. Results: The COSMIC: Intervention eDelphi survey contained 25 items and was completed by 199 participants. Following the consensus meeting, 15 outcomes were included. The COSMIC: Observation eDelphi survey contained 17 items and was completed by 129 participants. Sixteen outcomes were included. Eight core outcomes were common to both COS; tumor growth, physical, emotional, and neurocognitive functioning, overall quality of life, progression-free survival, meningioma-specific mortality and overall survival. Role and social functioning were core outcomes in COSMIC: Observation but not COSMIC: Intervention. Conclusions: Uptake of these COS in relevant future meningioma clinical studies will ensure that stakeholder-determined, critically important outcomes are consistently measured and reported across similar clinical studies.
Authors
- Andrew R. Brodbelt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8722-707X)
- Anthony G Marson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6861-8806)
- Sumirat M. Keshwara (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5390-9996)
- Helen Bulbeck (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6775-5251)
- Thomas Santarius (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1416-9566)
- Mohsen Javadpour (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9836-1741)
- Abdurrahman I. Islim (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9621-043X)
- Nisaharan Srikandarajah (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9578-508X)
- Carole Turner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8297-4890)
- Sabrina Bell
- Shelli D Koszdin
- Michael McDermott (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7944-5181)
- Paul L. Grundy
- Linda Dirven
- Christopher P Millward
- Michael Weller
- Paula R Williamson
- Martin J B Taphoorn
- Terri S Armstrong
- Torstein R Meling
- Gelareh Zadeh
- Amir H Zamanipoor Najafabadi
- Colin Watts
- Kathy Oliver
- Puneet Plaha
Publication Details
- Journal
- Universität Zürich, ZORA
- Published
- 2025-02-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-283253
- Primary Topic
- Delphi Technique in Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00