Quantifying AI Model Trust as a Model Sureness Measure by Bidirectional Active Processing and Visual Knowledge Discovery

Trust in machine-learning models is critical for deployment by users, especially for high-risk tasks such as healthcare. Model trust involves much more than performance metrics such as accuracy, precision, or recall. It includes user readiness to allow a model to make decisions. Model trust is a multifaceted concept commonly associated with the stability of model predictions under variations in training data, noise, algorithmic parameters, and model explanations. This paper extends existing model trust concepts by introducing a novel Model Sureness measure. Some alternatively purposed Model Sureness measures have been proposed. Here, Model Sureness quantitatively measures the model accuracy stability under training data variations. For any model, this is carried out by combining the proposed Bidirectional Active Processing and Visual Knowledge Discovery. The proposed Bidirectional Active Processing method iteratively retrains a model on varied training data until a user-defined stopping criterion is met; in this work, this criterion is set to a 95% accuracy when the model is evaluated on the test data. This process further finds a minimal sufficient training dataset required for a model to satisfy this criterion. Accordingly, the proposed Model Sureness measure is defined as the ratio of the number of unnecessary cases to all cases in the training data along with variations of these ratios. Higher ratios indicate a greater Model Sureness under this measure, while trust in a model is ultimately a human decision based on multiple measures. Case studies conducted on three benchmark datasets from biology, medicine, and handwritten digit recognition demonstrate a well-preserved model accuracy with Model Sureness scores that reflect the capabilities of the evaluated models. Specifically, unnecessary case removal ranged from 20% to 80%, with an average reduction of approximately 50% of the training data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronics
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15030580
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying AI Model Trust as a Model Sureness Measure by Bidirectional Active Processing and Visual Knowledge Discovery

Boris Kovalerchuk, Alice Williams
Electronics
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

Quantifying AI Model Trust as a Model Sureness Measure by Bidirectional Active Processing and Visual Knowledge Discovery

Boris Kovalerchuk, Alice Williams
article en

Abstract

Trust in machine-learning models is critical for deployment by users, especially for high-risk tasks such as healthcare. Model trust involves much more than performance metrics such as accuracy, precision, or recall. It includes user readiness to allow a model to make decisions. Model trust is a multifaceted concept commonly associated with the stability of model predictions under variations in training data, noise, algorithmic parameters, and model explanations. This paper extends existing model trust concepts by introducing a novel Model Sureness measure. Some alternatively purposed Model Sureness measures have been proposed. Here, Model Sureness quantitatively measures the model accuracy stability under training data variations. For any model, this is carried out by combining the proposed Bidirectional Active Processing and Visual Knowledge Discovery. The proposed Bidirectional Active Processing method iteratively retrains a model on varied training data until a user-defined stopping criterion is met; in this work, this criterion is set to a 95% accuracy when the model is evaluated on the test data. This process further finds a minimal sufficient training dataset required for a model to satisfy this criterion. Accordingly, the proposed Model Sureness measure is defined as the ratio of the number of unnecessary cases to all cases in the training data along with variations of these ratios. Higher ratios indicate a greater Model Sureness under this measure, while trust in a model is ultimately a human decision based on multiple measures. Case studies conducted on three benchmark datasets from biology, medicine, and handwritten digit recognition demonstrate a well-preserved model accuracy with Model Sureness scores that reflect the capabilities of the evaluated models. Specifically, unnecessary case removal ranged from 20% to 80%, with an average reduction of approximately 50% of the training data.

ElectronicsVol. 15(3)
Central Washington University (US), Western Washington University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.