Abstract TP072: Use of the Delirium Burden Index to Assess Delirium-related Odds of Morality Among Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

Background: Delirium is associated with mortality for patients admitted with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Delirium fluctuates, however, and patients with sustained delirium likely face increased risks. The Delirium Burden Index (DBI) has been proposed to measure overall delirium dose and may provide more nuanced assessment of patient condition. Methods: Data for patients admitted AIS between May 2016 and August 2025 were retrieved from the Registry of Neurological Endpoint Assessment among patients with Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke (REINAH), including demographic, comorbidity, medication, and outcome data. Delirium was assessed every 12 hours for patients over 70 using the modified 4A’s Test and classified as delirium present on admission (onset within 48hrs of admission; DPOA) and hospital-acquired delirium (onset after 48hrs; HAD). Patient DBI was calculated as the squared number of positive assessments divided by the total number of assessments. Statistical differences were assessed using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Logistic regression models were fit to determine the association of DBI with inpatient morality as a numerical variable and when stratified by rounded quartiles. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported. Results: Data were collected for 22849 AIS patients (median age: 69 [59-79]; 11536 (51.2%) Female; 3,428 (15.3%) Hispanic; 14924 (66.2%) White, 5995 (26.6%) Black, 1,288 (5.7%) Asian, 325 (1.4%) Other). In total, 6458 (28.6%) exhibited delirium with 4716 (20.9%) having delirium on admission (DOA) and 1742 (7.7%). Delirious patients had median DBI of 2.67 [0.57-7.11]. Patients with DOA had a significantly higher DBI than those with HAD (3.27 [0.88-8.00] vs 1.05 [0.25-4.45]; p<0.001) and, among delirious patients, those who expired had significantly higher DBI (4.5 [1.8-9.0] vs 2.3 [0.5-7.0]; p<0.001). In multivariable modelling of delirious patients, DBI showed a per-point adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) of 1.02 [1.01-1.04] (p=0.002) and significantly higher odds of mortality were shown for all elevated DBI groups (1-3: 1.84 [1.44-2.35]; 3-7: 1.78 [1.41-2.26]; >7: 1.92 [1.52-2.43], vs <1) (Figure 1). Discussion: Assessing the overall dose of delirium can provide a nuanced perspective of patient status. The DBI provides a measure of delirium dose that is significantly associated with in-hospital morality, even when controlling for stroke severity and time of delirium onset.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stroke
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/str.57.suppl_1.tp072
Primary Topic
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract TP072: Use of the Delirium Burden Index to Assess Delirium-related Odds of Morality Among Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

Kathryn Agarwal, Thomas Potter, Farhaan Vahidy, Alan Pan et al.
Stroke
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
article

Abstract TP072: Use of the Delirium Burden Index to Assess Delirium-related Odds of Morality Among Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

Kathryn Agarwal, Thomas Potter, Farhaan Vahidy, Alan Pan, Jessica M. Meers, Karim Borei, Osman Khan, Abdulaziz Bako, George Taffet, Sara Nowakowski, Alicia Stutz
article en

Abstract

Background: Delirium is associated with mortality for patients admitted with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Delirium fluctuates, however, and patients with sustained delirium likely face increased risks. The Delirium Burden Index (DBI) has been proposed to measure overall delirium dose and may provide more nuanced assessment of patient condition. Methods: Data for patients admitted AIS between May 2016 and August 2025 were retrieved from the Registry of Neurological Endpoint Assessment among patients with Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke (REINAH), including demographic, comorbidity, medication, and outcome data. Delirium was assessed every 12 hours for patients over 70 using the modified 4A’s Test and classified as delirium present on admission (onset within 48hrs of admission; DPOA) and hospital-acquired delirium (onset after 48hrs; HAD). Patient DBI was calculated as the squared number of positive assessments divided by the total number of assessments. Statistical differences were assessed using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Logistic regression models were fit to determine the association of DBI with inpatient morality as a numerical variable and when stratified by rounded quartiles. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported. Results: Data were collected for 22849 AIS patients (median age: 69 [59-79]; 11536 (51.2%) Female; 3,428 (15.3%) Hispanic; 14924 (66.2%) White, 5995 (26.6%) Black, 1,288 (5.7%) Asian, 325 (1.4%) Other). In total, 6458 (28.6%) exhibited delirium with 4716 (20.9%) having delirium on admission (DOA) and 1742 (7.7%). Delirious patients had median DBI of 2.67 [0.57-7.11]. Patients with DOA had a significantly higher DBI than those with HAD (3.27 [0.88-8.00] vs 1.05 [0.25-4.45]; p<0.001) and, among delirious patients, those who expired had significantly higher DBI (4.5 [1.8-9.0] vs 2.3 [0.5-7.0]; p<0.001). In multivariable modelling of delirious patients, DBI showed a per-point adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) of 1.02 [1.01-1.04] (p=0.002) and significantly higher odds of mortality were shown for all elevated DBI groups (1-3: 1.84 [1.44-2.35]; 3-7: 1.78 [1.41-2.26]; >7: 1.92 [1.52-2.43], vs <1) (Figure 1). Discussion: Assessing the overall dose of delirium can provide a nuanced perspective of patient status. The DBI provides a measure of delirium dose that is significantly associated with in-hospital morality, even when controlling for stroke severity and time of delirium onset.

StrokeVol. 57(Suppl_1)
Houston Methodist (US), Memorial Hermann Institute for Rehabilitation and Research Foundation (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), Methodist Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.