Modeling Geoid and Dynamic Topography From Tomography‐Based Thermo‐Chemical Mantle Convection

Abstract Mantle convection causes the most important contribution to the geoid and dynamic topography. With mantle density inferred from high‐resolution tomography models and numerical methods solving the governing equations of viscous mantle flow, the modeled geoid can fit the observations well. However, there is still a large discrepancy between present dynamic topography predicted by mantle flow and residual topography deduced from observations: Especially, large negative topography is predicted in cratons, contrary to observations. In order to improve the fit of model dynamic topography compared to observations, in this study, we include chemical density anomalies in Earth's lithosphere to model geoid and dynamic topography. We also combine these anomalies with lateral viscosity variations and study the effect on predicted dynamic topography and geoid and investigate which density models would yield a good fit. In the sublithospheric mantle, under the assumption that the density anomalies are induced from temperature variations, we use temperature‐dependent viscosity. Our results show that by adding chemical density anomalies in the continental lithosphere, we can improve the correlation between dynamic topography and residual topography by 37%–59% for the three tomography models compared with one of the residual tomography models considered (RT1) and 1%–11% compared with the other (RT2). Similarly, correlation can also be improved and amplitude ratio brought closer to 1 by downscaling lithospheric density anomalies. Our results could provide a good reference for further studies of the Earth's mantle.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025jb031837
Primary Topic
High-pressure geophysics and materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling Geoid and Dynamic Topography From Tomography‐Based Thermo‐Chemical Mantle Convection

B. Steinberger, Ronghua Cui, Jian Fang
Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
High-pressure geophysics and materials
article

Modeling Geoid and Dynamic Topography From Tomography‐Based Thermo‐Chemical Mantle Convection

B. Steinberger, Ronghua Cui, Jian Fang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Mantle convection causes the most important contribution to the geoid and dynamic topography. With mantle density inferred from high‐resolution tomography models and numerical methods solving the governing equations of viscous mantle flow, the modeled geoid can fit the observations well. However, there is still a large discrepancy between present dynamic topography predicted by mantle flow and residual topography deduced from observations: Especially, large negative topography is predicted in cratons, contrary to observations. In order to improve the fit of model dynamic topography compared to observations, in this study, we include chemical density anomalies in Earth's lithosphere to model geoid and dynamic topography. We also combine these anomalies with lateral viscosity variations and study the effect on predicted dynamic topography and geoid and investigate which density models would yield a good fit. In the sublithospheric mantle, under the assumption that the density anomalies are induced from temperature variations, we use temperature‐dependent viscosity. Our results show that by adding chemical density anomalies in the continental lithosphere, we can improve the correlation between dynamic topography and residual topography by 37%–59% for the three tomography models compared with one of the residual tomography models considered (RT1) and 1%–11% compared with the other (RT2). Similarly, correlation can also be improved and amplitude ratio brought closer to 1 by downscaling lithospheric density anomalies. Our results could provide a good reference for further studies of the Earth's mantle.

Journal of Geophysical Research Solid EarthVol. 131(2)
Southwest Forestry University (CN), GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences (DE)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Scholarship Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
High-pressure geophysics and materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Modeling Geoid and Dynamic Topography From Tomography‐Based Thermo‐Chemical Mantle Convection — B. Steinberger, Ronghua Cui, et al. · Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS