Abstract A006: The Time-Dependent Impact of Mismatch Profiles on Outcomes Following Endovascular Thrombectomy for Large Ischemic Stroke

Background: Endovascular therapy (EVT) has demonstrated efficacy in patients with large core infarctions, yet favorable outcomes remain limited. While mismatch profiles have long informed EVT decision-making in small-core strokes, their prognostic significance in large-core infarcts remains uncertain and may be affected by time from symptom onset. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between mismatch profiles, time distribution, and EVT efficacy in patients with large ischemic cores. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of the ANGEL-ASPECT trial in patients with large ischemic cores randomized to EVT or medical management. Baseline imaging included noncontrast CT, CT or MR angiography, and perfusion imaging. The primary outcome was independent ambulation (modified Rankin Scale score 0–3) at 90 days. Analyses were stratified by mismatch profile (mismatch ratio ≥1.8 and volume ≥15 mL) and onset-to-imaging time ( 6 hours vs. >6 hours). Results: Among 426 patients, 81.2% demonstrated a mismatch profile. Mismatch prevalence increased with longer onset-to-imaging times (P = 0.0047). In the early window ( 6 hours), EVT significantly improved independent ambulation in patients with mismatch (48.9% vs. 28.4%, OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.28–4.55, p = 0.0063) but not in unmismatch patients (23.8% vs. 27.3%, OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.21–3.29, p = 0.7949). In the late window (>6 hours), EVT did not significantly improve independent ambulation in either mismatch or unmismatch patients. Conclusions: Among patients with large infarct cores, unmismatch profile is more frequently observed in the early time window and is associated with diminished benefit from EVT. These results emphasize the importance of mismatch evaluation, even in early-presenting patients, to guide optimal treatment selection in patients with large ischemic cores. Trial registration number: NCT04551664.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stroke
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/str.57.suppl_1.a006
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract A006: The Time-Dependent Impact of Mismatch Profiles on Outcomes Following Endovascular Thrombectomy for Large Ischemic Stroke

Z. Li, Miao Zhongrong, Jie Chen
Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

Abstract A006: The Time-Dependent Impact of Mismatch Profiles on Outcomes Following Endovascular Thrombectomy for Large Ischemic Stroke

Z. Li, Miao Zhongrong, Jie Chen
article en

Abstract

Background: Endovascular therapy (EVT) has demonstrated efficacy in patients with large core infarctions, yet favorable outcomes remain limited. While mismatch profiles have long informed EVT decision-making in small-core strokes, their prognostic significance in large-core infarcts remains uncertain and may be affected by time from symptom onset. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between mismatch profiles, time distribution, and EVT efficacy in patients with large ischemic cores. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of the ANGEL-ASPECT trial in patients with large ischemic cores randomized to EVT or medical management. Baseline imaging included noncontrast CT, CT or MR angiography, and perfusion imaging. The primary outcome was independent ambulation (modified Rankin Scale score 0–3) at 90 days. Analyses were stratified by mismatch profile (mismatch ratio ≥1.8 and volume ≥15 mL) and onset-to-imaging time ( 6 hours vs. >6 hours). Results: Among 426 patients, 81.2% demonstrated a mismatch profile. Mismatch prevalence increased with longer onset-to-imaging times (P = 0.0047). In the early window ( 6 hours), EVT significantly improved independent ambulation in patients with mismatch (48.9% vs. 28.4%, OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.28–4.55, p = 0.0063) but not in unmismatch patients (23.8% vs. 27.3%, OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.21–3.29, p = 0.7949). In the late window (>6 hours), EVT did not significantly improve independent ambulation in either mismatch or unmismatch patients. Conclusions: Among patients with large infarct cores, unmismatch profile is more frequently observed in the early time window and is associated with diminished benefit from EVT. These results emphasize the importance of mismatch evaluation, even in early-presenting patients, to guide optimal treatment selection in patients with large ischemic cores. Trial registration number: NCT04551664.

StrokeVol. 57(Suppl_1)
Beijing Tian Tan Hospital (CN), Society of Interventional Radiology (US), Dayton Interventional Radiology (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.