Bounding the optimal number of policies for robust K-Adaptability

Abstract In the realm of robust optimization the k -adaptability approach is one promising method to derive approximate solutions for two-stage robust optimization problems. Instead of allowing all possible second-stage decisions, the k -adaptability approach aims at calculating a limited set of k such decisions already in the first-stage before the uncertainty is revealed. The parameter k can be adjusted to control the quality of the approximation. However, not much is known on how many solutions k are needed to achieve an optimal solution for the two-stage robust problem. In this work we derive bounds on k which guarantee optimality for general non-linear problems with integer decisions where the uncertainty appears in the objective function or in the constraints. For convex uncertainty sets we show that for objective uncertainty the bound depends linearly on the dimension of the uncertainty, while for constraint uncertainty the dependence can be exponential, still providing the first generic bound for a wide class of problems. Additionally, we provide approximation guarantees if k is smaller than the derived bounds. The results give new insights on how many solutions are needed for problems as the decision dependent information discovery problem or the capital budgeting problem with constraint uncertainty. Finally, for finite uncertainty sets we show that calculating the minimal k for which k -adaptable and two-stage problems are equivalent is NP-hard and derive a greedy method which approximates this k for the case where no first-stage decisions exist.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematical Programming
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-026-02329-1
Primary Topic
Risk and Portfolio Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bounding the optimal number of policies for robust K-Adaptability

Jannis Kurtz
Mathematical Programming
Risk and Portfolio Optimization
article

Bounding the optimal number of policies for robust K-Adaptability

Jannis Kurtz
article en

Abstract

Abstract In the realm of robust optimization the k -adaptability approach is one promising method to derive approximate solutions for two-stage robust optimization problems. Instead of allowing all possible second-stage decisions, the k -adaptability approach aims at calculating a limited set of k such decisions already in the first-stage before the uncertainty is revealed. The parameter k can be adjusted to control the quality of the approximation. However, not much is known on how many solutions k are needed to achieve an optimal solution for the two-stage robust problem. In this work we derive bounds on k which guarantee optimality for general non-linear problems with integer decisions where the uncertainty appears in the objective function or in the constraints. For convex uncertainty sets we show that for objective uncertainty the bound depends linearly on the dimension of the uncertainty, while for constraint uncertainty the dependence can be exponential, still providing the first generic bound for a wide class of problems. Additionally, we provide approximation guarantees if k is smaller than the derived bounds. The results give new insights on how many solutions are needed for problems as the decision dependent information discovery problem or the capital budgeting problem with constraint uncertainty. Finally, for finite uncertainty sets we show that calculating the minimal k for which k -adaptable and two-stage problems are equivalent is NP-hard and derive a greedy method which approximates this k for the case where no first-stage decisions exist.

Mathematical Programming
Amsterdam University College (NL), Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Risk and Portfolio Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.