Abstract TP190: SHOULD PATIENTS WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION BE INCLUDED IN STENT TRIALS: POST HOC ANALYSIS FROM RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS

Background: Most trials evaluating the therapeutic benefit of stent placement have excluded patients with atrial fibrillation. We performed this analysis to determine the effect of the inclusion of patients with atrial fibrillation in stent trials. Methods: We performed pooled analysis of patients with vertebral artery stenosis (measuring ≥50% in severity) from two randomized controlled trials evaluating stent placement versus medical treatment alone. We compared the risk of vertebrobasilar arterial distribution ischemic stroke and/or death (and other endpoints) post-randomization in patients with and without atrial fibrillation between the two groups using Cox proportional hazards models and tested the interaction between atrial fibrillation and stent placement in the Cox proportional hazards models. Results: A total of 21 patients (12 randomized to stent placement and 9 to best medical treatment only) among 244 randomized patients (follow up period 37.8 ± 19.7 months) had atrial fibrillation at baseline. Patients with atrial fibrillation were older (mean age 74.0 versus 66.2 years), had a higher proportion of patients with hypertension (76.2% versus 68.2%), and lower proportion of cigarette smokers (4.8% versus 30.0%). Patients with atrial fibrillation were more likely to be on oral anticoagulants (47.6% versus 2.2%). The risks of vertebrobasilar arterial distribution ischemic stroke and/or death (14.3% versus 5.4%, hazard ratio [HR] 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4 - 4.8, p= 0.54), any stroke (9.5% versus 9.4%, HR 1.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3 - 4.7, p= 0.90), ischemic stroke (4.7% versus 9.4%, HR 0.6, 95% CI 0.1 – 4.1, p= 0.56), and any stroke and/or death (23.8% versus 13.9%, HR 1.9, 95% 0.7- 4.9, p= 0.19) were higher in patients with atrial fibrillation. The interaction terms between atrial fibrillation and allocated treatment (best medical treatment versus stent placement) in the Cox proportional hazards models (included age and location of stenosis) were not significant for vertebrobasilar arterial distribution ischemic stroke and/or death or any stroke and/or death. Conclusions: Our analysis identifies challenges in inclusion of patients with atrial fibrillation due to differences in baseline characteristics and associated outcomes. However, the treatment effect of stent placement was not modified by atrial fibrillation suggesting stratified randomization may be acceptable in randomized controlled trials .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stroke
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/str.57.suppl_1.tp190
Primary Topic
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract TP190: SHOULD PATIENTS WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION BE INCLUDED IN STENT TRIALS: POST HOC ANALYSIS FROM RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS

Camilo R. Gomez, Yilun Huang, Adnan Qureshi, M Fareed Suri
Stroke
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
article

Abstract TP190: SHOULD PATIENTS WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION BE INCLUDED IN STENT TRIALS: POST HOC ANALYSIS FROM RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS

Camilo R. Gomez, Yilun Huang, Adnan Qureshi, M Fareed Suri
article en

Abstract

Background: Most trials evaluating the therapeutic benefit of stent placement have excluded patients with atrial fibrillation. We performed this analysis to determine the effect of the inclusion of patients with atrial fibrillation in stent trials. Methods: We performed pooled analysis of patients with vertebral artery stenosis (measuring ≥50% in severity) from two randomized controlled trials evaluating stent placement versus medical treatment alone. We compared the risk of vertebrobasilar arterial distribution ischemic stroke and/or death (and other endpoints) post-randomization in patients with and without atrial fibrillation between the two groups using Cox proportional hazards models and tested the interaction between atrial fibrillation and stent placement in the Cox proportional hazards models. Results: A total of 21 patients (12 randomized to stent placement and 9 to best medical treatment only) among 244 randomized patients (follow up period 37.8 ± 19.7 months) had atrial fibrillation at baseline. Patients with atrial fibrillation were older (mean age 74.0 versus 66.2 years), had a higher proportion of patients with hypertension (76.2% versus 68.2%), and lower proportion of cigarette smokers (4.8% versus 30.0%). Patients with atrial fibrillation were more likely to be on oral anticoagulants (47.6% versus 2.2%). The risks of vertebrobasilar arterial distribution ischemic stroke and/or death (14.3% versus 5.4%, hazard ratio [HR] 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4 - 4.8, p= 0.54), any stroke (9.5% versus 9.4%, HR 1.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3 - 4.7, p= 0.90), ischemic stroke (4.7% versus 9.4%, HR 0.6, 95% CI 0.1 – 4.1, p= 0.56), and any stroke and/or death (23.8% versus 13.9%, HR 1.9, 95% 0.7- 4.9, p= 0.19) were higher in patients with atrial fibrillation. The interaction terms between atrial fibrillation and allocated treatment (best medical treatment versus stent placement) in the Cox proportional hazards models (included age and location of stenosis) were not significant for vertebrobasilar arterial distribution ischemic stroke and/or death or any stroke and/or death. Conclusions: Our analysis identifies challenges in inclusion of patients with atrial fibrillation due to differences in baseline characteristics and associated outcomes. However, the treatment effect of stent placement was not modified by atrial fibrillation suggesting stratified randomization may be acceptable in randomized controlled trials .

StrokeVol. 57(Suppl_1)
St. Cloud Hospital (US), University of Missouri (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.