From “Gatekeeping” to Supported Autonomy: Rethinking Mandatory Companions in Predictive Testing

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ncn3.70083
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
41.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From “Gatekeeping” to Supported Autonomy: Rethinking Mandatory Companions in Predictive Testing

Leonardo Pereira Levada
1 citations
Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience
Ethics in Clinical Research
41.85
article

From “Gatekeeping” to Supported Autonomy: Rethinking Mandatory Companions in Predictive Testing

Leonardo Pereira Levada
article en
1 citations

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.
Neurology and Clinical NeuroscienceVol. 14(2)
Universidade Federal Fluminense (BR), Hospital Universitário Antônio Pedro (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Ethics in Clinical Research
41.85
DOISourceOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.