Utilizing PBL Height Data From Multiple Observing Systems in the GEOS System. Part II: Assessment of PBL Height Data

Abstract This sequel study continues to develop a strategic framework for the global Planetary Boundary Layer Height (PBLH) analysis and monitoring using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) data assimilation (DA) system. The framework supports the assessment of PBLH from multiple observing systems, including radiosonde, Global Navigation Satellite System‐Radio Occultation (GNSS‐RO), spaceborne lidars: Cloud‐Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) and Cloud‐Aerosol Transport System (CATS), ground‐based lidar: NASA Micro‐Pulse Lidar Network (MPLNET), and ground‐based radar: networks of radar wind profilers (GRWP), using either consistent or inconsistent PBLH definitions from the GEOS model. A comprehensive evaluation over a 27‐day period (23 August –18 September 2015) is performed to quantify the PBLH Observation minus Forecast bias and Root Mean Square Deviation across data types. Although radiosonde, GNSS‐RO, and GRWP PBLH are assessed using consistent model definitions, lidar‐based PBLH is compared using inconsistent ones due to current model limitations. The results underscore the importance of using physically and instrumentally consistent model PBLH with corresponding PBLH observations. They further demonstrate that robust quality control and thinning procedures tailored to each observation type are critical, particularly when model definition and PBLH observations are inconsistent. The results also highlight notable discrepancies among two space‐based lidar PBLH data sets, especially over the ocean, which the implementation of corresponding lidar‐based model PBLH and advanced PBLH retrieval algorithms are expected to reduce. The developed framework enables a robust evaluation of current and future PBLH data sets and serves as a foundation for an effective assimilation strategy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025jd044701
Primary Topic
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Utilizing PBL Height Data From Multiple Observing Systems in the GEOS System. Part II: Assessment of PBL Height Data

Haydee Salmun, Meta Sienkiewicz, Manisha Ganeshan, Jasper R. Lewis et al.
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
article

Utilizing PBL Height Data From Multiple Observing Systems in the GEOS System. Part II: Assessment of PBL Height Data

Haydee Salmun, Meta Sienkiewicz, Manisha Ganeshan, Jasper R. Lewis, E.‐G. Yang, S. Palm, E. L. McGrath‐Spangler, N. P. Arnold, J. Santanello, D. Wu, J. E. Yorks, J. R. Piepmeier, E. J. Welton, Y. Zhu, P. A. Selmer
article en

Abstract

Abstract This sequel study continues to develop a strategic framework for the global Planetary Boundary Layer Height (PBLH) analysis and monitoring using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) data assimilation (DA) system. The framework supports the assessment of PBLH from multiple observing systems, including radiosonde, Global Navigation Satellite System‐Radio Occultation (GNSS‐RO), spaceborne lidars: Cloud‐Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) and Cloud‐Aerosol Transport System (CATS), ground‐based lidar: NASA Micro‐Pulse Lidar Network (MPLNET), and ground‐based radar: networks of radar wind profilers (GRWP), using either consistent or inconsistent PBLH definitions from the GEOS model. A comprehensive evaluation over a 27‐day period (23 August –18 September 2015) is performed to quantify the PBLH Observation minus Forecast bias and Root Mean Square Deviation across data types. Although radiosonde, GNSS‐RO, and GRWP PBLH are assessed using consistent model definitions, lidar‐based PBLH is compared using inconsistent ones due to current model limitations. The results underscore the importance of using physically and instrumentally consistent model PBLH with corresponding PBLH observations. They further demonstrate that robust quality control and thinning procedures tailored to each observation type are critical, particularly when model definition and PBLH observations are inconsistent. The results also highlight notable discrepancies among two space‐based lidar PBLH data sets, especially over the ocean, which the implementation of corresponding lidar‐based model PBLH and advanced PBLH retrieval algorithms are expected to reduce. The developed framework enables a robust evaluation of current and future PBLH data sets and serves as a foundation for an effective assimilation strategy.

Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresVol. 131(3)
The Graduate Center, CUNY (US), Goddard Space Flight Center (US), Hunter College (US), Global Science & Technology (United States) (US), Astrophysics Science Division (US), Science Systems and Applications (United States) (US), University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US), Morgan State University (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Goddard Space Flight Center
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.